SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (95385)9/14/2006 12:04:22 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 122087
 
"Some of TD Ameritrade's clients are already requesting their stock certificates in fear that TD Ameritrade may go under. They are moving their shares to other trading houses that they believe to be less likely to short this stock."



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (95385)9/14/2006 12:11:38 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
CSHD has 2,470,845 SHORT ACCORDING TO PINKSHEETS.COM WHICH ACCORDING TO PINKSHEETS IS ONE DAY TO COVER. DOES NOT SOUBD LIKE A MASSIVE AMMOUNT OF SHORT INTEREST

Symbol Security Name Venue Month/Year Short Interest
Percentage Change Average Daily Share Volume Days to Cover
CSHD CONVERSION SOL HLDGS OTCBB/Pink Sheets 08/2006 2,470,845 5377.98 5,838,124 1.00

pinksheets.com



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (95385)9/14/2006 12:16:27 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 122087
 
Enter Symbol Here To Discover How Short Squeezes Can Make You Money!

In September, 2006 the (XYBRQ) XYBERNAUT CORP SqueezeTrigger Price was $0.02. If you had purchased XYBRQ, the trade would have gained -51.69% as of today's price of $0.01. If you had traded 10,000 shares, you would currently have a gain of $-107.00. Click Here to signup for SqueezeTrigger Alerts!

buyins.net

BUYINS.NET THOMAS RONK. (CRD#2293671

===================================================
Thomas Carter RONK (CRD#2293671, Registered Representative,
Corona Del Mar, California)
submitted a Letter of
Acceptance, Waiver, and Consent
pursuant to which he was censured,
fined $50,000, and suspended
from association with any NASD
member in any capacity for 30
days. Without admitting or denying
the allegations, RONK consented to
the described sanctions and to the
entry of findings that he participated
in private securities transactions
without providing prior written
notice to his member firm describing
the proposed transactions and
his proposed role therein. (NASD
Case #C02990057)

==============================================
RONK, Thomas C.Individuals Revoked For
Failing To Pay Fines And/Or
Costs In Accordance With
NASD Rule 8320
=======================================================
Corona Del Mar, California
Individuals Revoked For
Failing To Pay Fines And/Or
Costs In Accordance With
NASD Rule 8320
Biddick, Bruce
Rancho Santa Fe, California
(February 8, 2002)
Chepak, John A.
West Harrison, New York
(February 8, 2002)
Flynn, Scott D.
Highlands, New Jersey
(February 8, 2002)
Gerace, Joseph G.
S. Laguna, California
(February 8, 2002)
RONK, Thomas C.
Corona Del Mar, California
(February 8, 2002)
Sitomer, Richard A.
New York, New York
(February 8, 2002)
Waddell, Charles K.
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
(February 8, 2002)
nasd.com



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (95385)9/15/2006 11:16:09 AM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
NCANS SIGNATURES PILING UP. JUST ADD NEW PARAGRAPHS

HUH?

=======================================================

NCANS Comment Letter Signature Update
Location: Blogs Bob O'Brien's Sanity Check Blog
Posted by: bobo 9/14/2006 8:41 PM

If you haven't read it, take out a few minutes and read the NCANS comment letter to the SEC. We've added a few paragraphs near the end, but it is pretty much complete.

One thing you may notice as you read other comment letters is that NCANS places much of the blame for the current state of affairs on two things - security entitlements being credited to investor accounts without any underlying securities to support them (essentially a futures contract for a share at some unknown point in the future), and exceptions for market makers that provide them with a competitive advantage over investors and other participants - they are essentially being provided a business edge, at investor expense, sacrificing investor protection and the public interest in order to provide liquidity to a select group of business interests. Something the SEC is NOT empowered nor authorized to do, and which is in fact counter to their mandate in the 1934 Act.

Read it.

And then please, join the 730 people who have so far sent in their contact info for their name to be added to the letter.

The goal is to get to at least a thousand, if at all possible. It's been a push due to the busy fax line. I thank you all for your patience.

Please, email me your name and contact info, and put in language that says, "I support the NCANS letter and authorize you to affix my name to the letter." We are getting close. Let's push it over the top.

NCANS.mgr@gmail.com is the address.

I am personally typing in each name, so nobody else is seeing your info, and it won't be provided to anyone for any reason, other than to the SEC if they want backup for the signatures being bona fide. The final letter will have all the names, nothing else, no signatures, no contact info - exactly as many of the industry letters have names.

A thousand signatures saying fix this now. Sent in over one week. That's powerful. It's time to decide whether you are part of the problem, or part of the solution. We've done the heavy lifting. Just typing the names in have occupied several days of my time. Nobody has charged you a dime to create a significant white paper that comprehensively addresses the causes, and the solutions. Our volunteers have spent weeks working on this, editing, rewriting, arguing over solutions, testing the logic, crafting the language.

Send the email. Make your voice heard. This is your time to do something.

Copyright ©2006 Bob O'Brien