Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend.... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (22933)	9/16/2006 1:08:55 AM
From: RMF	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 35834

We had Saddam under control and we had some understanding of Saddam. THAT'S why I didn't think it was necessary to invade Iraq. That doesn't make me PRO Saddam, it just makes me pragmatic. I also don't think we should invade N. Korea although I think that regime is the most heinous on the planet. Are YOU in favor of invading N. Korea??? If Not, does that mean you are PRO Kim? As far as Afghanistan, we never really finished the job there. We secured Kabul but we never put sufficient troops into the outlying areas to secure the rest of the country. We ALSO never caught Osama and his right hand man. Everybody's complaining that Clinton didn't kill the guy, but Bush doesn't even seem to be going after him even 5 years after 9/11.