SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend.... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sully- who wrote (22957)9/15/2006 5:20:28 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Air America, R.I.P.

Kathryn Jean Lopez
The Corner

An e-mail:

<<< ALL the Air America Radio on-air spin from Randi Rhodes, Stephanie Miller, Sam Seder, et all has the same sound byte: “We’ve succeeded in creating something that didn’t exist before.”

They certainly have: They’ve discovered the only talk radio format that NOBODY WANTS TO LISTEN TO— liberal talk. Virtually every other talk radio format— conservative talk, sports, news, cooking shows, the Car Talk guys, Stern, et all—has found audiences and sponsors. Only Air America Radio’s mix of left-wing blather and bad on-air talent has succeeded in repelling even the most devoted talk radio listener.

Congratulations, Air America Radio! >>>

corner.nationalreview.com



To: Sully- who wrote (22957)9/15/2006 11:11:23 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
AAR: That’s All, Folks!

Hot Air TV

hotair.com



To: Sully- who wrote (22957)10/17/2006 5:27:26 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
THE LITTLE NETWORK THAT COULDN'T

NEW YORK POST
Editorial
October 14, 2006

Gee, it looks like the air is oozing out of Air America - the ultra-liberal radio network meant to give the left a firmer foothold in one of the few areas of the media it doesn't dominate.

Yesterday, the network filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection while it tries to iron out its financial woes.

Don't look at us to shed any tears.

Let's be honest: It's not like the world needs more leftist skewing of the news.

Liberals already have that massive left-wing conglomerate - CBS ABC- NBC CNN NewYorkTimes-WashingtonPost L.A.Times - through which to promulgate their worldview.

It may be true, of course, that Air America - a better name might be Hot Air America - offers a bit of a novelty: "comedian" Al Franken. (Listeners can be forgiven if they mistake his "serious" political musings for jokes.)

But it looks like he and his fellow left-wingers are getting a tough lesson in free-market capitalism: If no one buys your rubbish, you might well go broke.

(Poor Al. Guess he just isn't "good enough" or "smart enough," after all. Guess, doggone it, people just don't like him . . .)

There's another reason, too, not to be terribly surprised at Air America's cash woes: After all, how did it ever expect to pay its bills when it was relying on funds looted from a nonprofit group meant for needy kids and seniors?

Leave it to liberals to come up with a "business plan" like that.

Two members of the nonprofit, the Gloria Wise Boys and Girls Club of The Bronx, pleaded guilty this month to skimming money - including $875,000 that went to Air America - from the charity.

A sympathetic Attorney General (and Gov.-Presumptive) Eliot Spitzer gave a pass to four others who were implicated - including Air America associate Evan Montvel-Cohen.

Sore that Fox News and talk radio had begun to make deep inroads into liberal domination of the media, leftists set up Air America during the height of the 2004 presidential election season.

From Day One, the network had a rocky time: It shifted on-air personalities more often than John Kerry changed positions on Iraq. Now it looks like the airwaves may be waving good-bye to the Air America leftists once and for all.

Question is: Will anybody notice when they're gone?

nypost.com



To: Sully- who wrote (22957)10/31/2006 2:28:50 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Here They Go Again: Liberals Talking Crazy

J. James Estrada
The American Thinker
10 30 06

It was announced late last week that Liberals were going to take to the airwaves again. Not content to have a biased media in print and on cable and television newscasts, now something called Nova M will step in and fall into the void (it can’t fill the void if there isn’t one, right?) of the radio airwaves. Have they never heard of Air America and NPR?

<<< “The extreme radical right has pretty much hijacked the airwaves,” said Mike Newcomb. >>>

Calling himself, “Dr. Mike,” Newcomb will be one of the hosts on this new venture. What Newcomb fails to realize is that the free markets determine what is and what is not successful on the airwaves. There is no need for likes of Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity to hijack that massive listener-ship they’ve earned through years of hard work.

I heard Newcomb for one segment on his previous show when he was part of Air America here in Phoenix. The caller was an immigrant from Cuba. She jumped on the Newcomb bandwagon of that day which was denouncing Bush for removing a dictator from Iraq who wasn’t really a threat to the U.S. She told Newcomb, “If Bush really wants to remove a dangerous dictator, he should remove Castro!” Oops! Newcomb had to spin some serious circles in the desert sand because this woman obviously didn’t follow the Liberal line with Cuba and Castro. Too many Liberals love Castro. Too many Liberals love dictators.

As I listened to Newcomb dance around the topic, I realized why Liberal talk radio will never succeed: they will never tell you the truth of what they believe. Don’t get too used to hearing and reading about this Nova M network. Like Air America, they have to depend on donors sending them money to stay on the dial. And that’s not how it works in American commerce.

americanthinker.com

phoenix.bizjournals.com^1366368



To: Sully- who wrote (22957)11/3/2006 6:57:49 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Air America (Intellectually) Bankrupt

By Captain Ed on National Politics
Captain's Quarters

If anyone wants to know why Air America can't hack it financially, a read of Jackie Guerra's op-ed piece at ABC News will demonstrate the network's intellectual bankruptcy. Guerra, who hosts the "Workin' It" show on the network, repeats the debunked claim that minorities and the poor are overrepresented in the military:


<<< Serving our country in the military is a great service, one which we all admire and revere, but it's more than that. It's also a job.

And it's a job that many Americans sign up for not only out of a sense of patriotic duty, but also because it often seems the best of few options.

As a Mexican-American from Los Angeles, I find it especially meaningful that Kerry's comments came at Pasadena City College, just a few miles from the high schools of East Los Angeles, where on many campuses, military recruiters outnumber guidance counselors 5-1.

At high schools like these across the country, inner-city and rural students, often from communities of color but almost always poor, do not have many options in George Bush's America. >>>


The former star of WB's "First Time Out"
-- which we know because Guerra tells us -- tries to hail John Kerry for his message supporting this contention even as she claims he didn't say it, which is bad enough. However, she is also dead wrong on the facts. If anything, the poor are underrepresented in today's military, as the Heritage Foundation's Tim Kane determined in his extensive analysis last year. Kane reviewed recruiting data for the years 2003-5 and found out that the military attracts mostly middle-class young men and women:


<<< In summary, the additional years of recruit data (2004–2005) sup­port the previous finding that U.S. military recruits are more similar than dissimilar to the American youth population. The slight dif­ferences are that wartime U.S. mil­itary enlistees are better educated, wealthier, and more rural on aver­age than their civilian peers.

Recruits have a higher percent­age of high school graduates and representation from Southern and rural areas. No evidence indicates exploitation of racial minorities (either by race or by race-weighted ZIP code areas). Finally, the distri­bution of household income of recruits is noticeably higher than that of the entire youth population. ...

By assigning each recruit the median 1999 household income for his hometown ZIP code as deter­mined from Census 2000, the mean income for 2004 recruits was $43,122 (in 1999 dollars). For 2005 recruits, it was $43,238 (in 1999 dol­lars). These are increases over the mean incomes for the 1999 cohort ($41,141) and 2003 cohort ($42,822). The national median published in Cen­sus 2000 was $41,994. This indicates that, on aver­age, the 2004 and 2005 recruit populations come from even wealthier areas than their peers who enlisted in 1999 and 2003.

When comparing these wartime recruits (2003– 2005) to the resident population ages 18–24 (as recorded in Census 2000), areas with median household income levels between $35,000 and $79,999 were overrepresented, along with income categories between $85,000 and $94,999. (See Chart 2.) Though the mainstream media continue to portray the war in Iraq as unpopular, this evi­dence suggests that the United States is not sending the poor to die for the interests of the rich. >>>

Guerra wants to pursue the tired stereotype of the military during the draft, a dynamic that disappeared along with compulsory service. During the Vietnam War, college deferments did create a disparity in induction, for an obvious reason: rich and upper-middle-class people could afford to send their young men to college. The disparity caused great resentment (which lingers to this day), and put pressure on the government to end the draft altogether.

As Kane reveals, the policy change made a huge difference in the composition of the military. It not only represents the best of America in terms of the honor and courage of its members, but also represents America demographically.

Guerra misses an important point about the economy with her mindless regurgitation of ancient leftists tropes, too -- the poor do have more choices. Unemployment has hit historic lows, and job creation has exploded over the last three years. She claims that people have few opportunities in "George Bush's America", but the truth is that in many areas, employers have a hard time filling positions for lack of applicants. And that fact can be seen in the underrepresentation of the poor in the military, because if the choices were really that limited and "militry recruiters outnumber guidance counselors by 5-1", we would see a lot more of the poor flooding into the military, and it just isn't happening.

Guerra's entire piece consists of fact-deficient allegations and baseless analysis, and the core of her argument is easily refuted by the specific data. Why does she then insist on denying reality in nationwide opinion pieces? Because that's apparently the Air America business plan -- which explains their financial bankruptcy.

captainsquartersblog.com

abcnews.go.com

heritage.org



To: Sully- who wrote (22957)2/1/2007 12:59:06 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
THE PERFECT STAR FOR AIR AMERICA

NEW YORK POST
Editorial
February 1, 2007

Well, whaddaya know - looks like Mark Green might finally get a job in the private sector.

Green's real-estate mogul brother, Stephen, emerged Monday as the latest financial angel to bail out the moribund Air America. The liberal radio network filed for bankruptcy protection three months ago, after a political-financial loan scandal exacerbated by never-out-of-the-subbasement ratings.

There's no word yet on whether Mark will get a position - on-air or in the executive suite - with the left-wing whinefest, but he's been a frequent guest host.

And maybe, just maybe, he's run his last losing campaign, following unsuccessful shots at the U.S. Senate (twice), the House, the New York City mayoralty and - most recently - New York state attorney general.

Air America and Mark Green are a perfect fit: The longer the network broadcasts, the fewer people who listen.

Much like Green's political career.

nypost.com



To: Sully- who wrote (22957)2/20/2007 3:14:06 AM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Liberals Aren’t Very Good at Talk Radio

By Ken Blackwell
Townhall.com Columnist
Tuesday, February 20, 2007

New York Congressman Maurice Hinchey is on a mission. His Website prominently quotes the congressman’s call to arms,

<<< “A diverse American media that presents a wide array of ideas from all sides of the political spectrum is essential to the maintenance of our democracy. If the media becomes corrupted then we've begun the erosion of the American political system and the American democracy.” >>>


Before we begin the chorus of amens, it’s important to note the congressman isn’t talking about the evening news on ABC, CBS and NBC. He isn’t talking about the New York Times, Washington Post, L.A. Times, San Francisco Chronicle or even the Cleveland Plain Dealer. And no, he doesn’t care about CNN and MSNBC either. They don’t bother the good representative. He is talking about Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, Hugh Hewitt, Dennis Prager and Michael Medved.

You see, Congressman Hinchey is a liberal and liberals are good at several things. They make entertaining movies and write catchy toe-tapping songs. They even make delicious all natural ice cream. But they can’t figure out talk radio. In fact, they are terrible at it. Al Franken never really competed with Rush Limbaugh as he had promised. And Air America Radio became a better punch line than bottom line.

While liberals hold a virtual monopoly on broadcast television and print news, many on the left just can’t stomach the reality of a dominant conservative presence on talk radio. They want to give Mr. Franken and his pessimism and rage-filed talk radio comrades something they could not obtain on their own – market share.

This is why liberals are so eager to bring back a roundly rejected and blatantly unconstitutional piece of government intrusiveness know as the Fairness Doctrine. And Hinchey is ready to do the heavy lifting with his Media Ownership Reform Act, which includes reinstatement of the doctrine. If it passes, the legislation would force radio stations that air conservative talk shows to also air liberal shows – regardless of listener interest or sponsor support.

It’s a tried and true strategy intended to silence voices with whom Hinchey and his liberal brethren disagree.

The doctrine was created by the Federal Communications Commission in 1949 to bring “balance” to political debate over the public airwaves.

During its initial run, Democrat and Republican administrations rode heard over broadcasters determining what was fair and threatening the licenses of those deemed not fair enough. Former Kennedy administration official Bill Ruder told Tony Snow for a 1993 Washington Times piece, “We had a massive strategy to use the fairness doctrine to challenge and harass the right-wing broadcasters, and hope the challenge would be so costly to them that they would be inhibited and decide it was too expensive to continue.”

The Fairness Doctrine was ultimately repealed in 1987 by the great enemy of foreign and domestic oppressor alike – Ronald Reagan. He referred to the doctrine as “antagonistic to the freedom of expression guaranteed by the First Amendment.”

As a result, Rush Limbaugh exploded onto the scene and started what is now referred to as the “new media” providing detailed analysis and debate to encourage listeners to read between the lines of reports from the often liberal mainstream media. This deregulation of the radio industry also helped revitalize AM radio, which was dying during the 1970s thanks to the newly popular static-free FM stations.

Radio stations were finally able to broadcast local and syndicated content to fit the local market preferences, without fear of government intervention. Now, instead of only about 100 talk radio stations, Americans can choose from more than 1,400, not including satellite radio or talk show internet audio streams. In fact, since Reagan put an end to the talk radio police, there are more liberal and conservative talk show hosts on the air than ever before.

With talk shows on AM, FM, HD and satellite radio, and streamed over the internet, there are an infinite number of ways for every conceivable opinion to be broadcasted.

Giving government a power it instinctively will abuse is never a prudent course of action.

If liberals think it’s just too hard to compete with the Rush Limbaughs of the world, then they should focus on what they do best, like making ice cream. Congressman Hinchey would be pleased to know that Ben and Jerry’s even has a flavor for him – New York Super Fudge Chunk.

Ken Blackwell is the former Secretary of State of Ohio.

townhall.com



To: Sully- who wrote (22957)2/20/2007 6:56:24 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 35834
 
Air America Steers for the Iceberg

By Michael McBride
Townhall.com Columnist
Tuesday, February 20, 2007

I am not one to explain all things…I remember thinking my brain was probably full when I was learning the aircraft electrical systems of the F/A 18 Hornet. Having previously learned the T-2 (Fighter) Buckeye, The T-39 Saberliner, the TA-4J Skyhawk…The F-4 and the RF-4B…I felt it was getting a little cramped upstairs. Throw in intercept geometry at 900 knots, dogfight tactics, air-to air and air-to-ground weaponry, fusing and delivery options, and there just didn’t seem to be much capacity left. I am sure that many that know me would likely agree.

But some things I get. While reading the Oregonian’s fawning article on Thom Hartmann filling the vacuum (literally) left by Al Franken at Air America, I thought that it is no surprise that successful talk radio is mostly conservative.

The new star of the Portland and the left leaning airwaves is toasted as a do-aller of enormous proportions. He is bragged about as the author of many books, a successful businessman (who has abandoned several “successful” businesses), and is hailed as a liberal iconoclast bolstered by three decades of “personal and professional meanderings.”

The Oregonian glibly glosses over his intentional flunking out of Air Force Basic Training…likely a badge of honor amongst liberal “leadership.” They additionally glide past the incongruity that this college drop out has published several books on such subjects as AD/HD, and the powers of walking for as a cure for an enumerative list of chronic ailments, as if an expert; and they laud his JKF assassination conspiracy book. I suppose expertise doesn’t actually come into play on these subjects…feel good liberal concepts fix or explain it all. Wikipedia calls him a “lay scholar.” I guess that means a scholar without a degree.

So this is the Al Franken replacement?

The Oregonian is hyped up on his granola feel, his “precocious” (I guess, yet incomplete) college career at the academically un-prestigious Michigan State University, and his vegetarianism…a local leftie necessity. At least Franken was a Harvard grad.

For all you Rush haters, I know that he is also a college drop-out. No need to send hate mail on that. But Rush developed and refined the milieu, all others are, as Hartmann says in the Oregonian article, students of the master…or for the lesser skilled, imitators. The feeling I get is that Hartmann is an empty imitator.

Bill Bennett is an accomplished author who happened to forgo writing about his feelings on AD/HD, and chose instead to write about things that he is qualified to comment on. He has a long history of government service, and has a doctorate in Philosophy and a law degree from Harvard. I guess he chose to pass his tests and complete his precocious education.

Hugh Hewitt is a Harvard grad, Michigan Law School graduate…law professor, and writer (on subjects which he happens to actually know about).

Michael Medved is a Yale graduate with a Yale law degree. He is also an accomplished writer and movie critic.

So, as the Titanic known as Air America continues to take on water, and the highly paid captain has chosen to abandon the ship, Air America looks to a relative lightweight to try to save the ship. Academically deficient Janeane Garofolo didn’t posses that capability. I am not sure why AA thinks Hartmann possesses it.

The successful, conservative talk show hosts listed above, are successful, in large measure due to their credibility, derived directly from their bona fides. Their breadth of governmental, academic, and legal expertise, serves them well in putting a superior product on the air very day. They can capably wade through myriad of topics, because they are qualified to do so.

At the same time, Air America has called the neighborhood yacht club regatta winner to try to steer the Titanic to safety. Sorry, but a “lay scholar” isn’t likely to navigate that sinking ship through the choppy waters of talk radio. Deftness is not enough to overcome and inexpert knowledge in a business that is dependent on at least a modicum of credibility.

Air America is doomed…in part because there is no market for the superficial nature of liberal arguments. There is no market for a continuous stream of vulgarities, and shallow analysis.

There is no developed market for negativism and defeatism. There is no interest in the vitriolic exchange of ideas that is a constant in the left side of the blogosphere. And there is no market for the re-treading of lies that the Michael Moores, the Bill Mohrs, and the Al Frankens spew, day in and day out.

And they are doomed in part because they have picked a darling of the left, who is not capable of swimming in the big pond. Air America is going down. Though they may have picked an able seaman, they certainly have picked no Captain.

If Hartmann is to save the ship…make for the lifeboats…if Franken hasn’t taken them all.

Michael E. McBride retired as a Major from the Marine Corps and blogs at mysandmen.blogspot.com.

townhall.com



To: Sully- who wrote (22957)1/21/2010 5:41:18 PM
From: Sully-2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35834
 
Air America Shuts Down

Air America, the progressive radio network that had only this year debuted in Washington and moved into facilities on Idaho Ave., announced today that it will cease all broadcast operations as of this afternoon, in anticipation of a forthcoming Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing. In a memorandum to Air America staff this afternoon, Chairman Charlie Kireker blamed the "very difficult economic environment" for the demise of Air America, noting that a "painstaking search for new investors has come close several times right up into this week, but ultimately fell short of success." Starting at 6 p.m. EST today, Air America will provide its affiliates a selection of encore programming until 9 p.m. EST on Monday, Jan. 25, at which time "Air America programming will end."

dcist.com