Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (303247)	9/15/2006 1:01:32 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1580058

The president deciding to follow the legal requirements of the constitution doesn't require him to have the judicial branches authority to finally settle constitutional issues. The constitution gives powers to the president and to the legislature. If the legislature acts outside of its limits the law it makes is invalid. Its invalid immediately before any constitutional review by the judiciary. If the law is an attempt to impose an unconstitutional requirement the president is justified, even required by his oath of office, to not enforce the law. When controversy arises as to an important case the judiciary finally decides the case.