SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: koan who wrote (21121)9/15/2006 3:02:45 PM
From: E. Charters  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78419
 
I always felt that if the drugs were dangerous enough, they supplied their own penalty for the ill advised ingestion, obviating the need for a constabulary and penal system to control them.

On a serious note, given that most drug/alcohol use is a psycho-pharmalogical illness in and of itself and is for the most part genetically driven by conditions such as depression and the so called addictive personality, the best way to combat it societally is to make it expensive to get the drugs, and then deal with the user as a mandated pro-bono patient, using all that is known in medicine and psychology today to induce weaning from the lifestyle, psychosis, and physiological lock in of the substance. L-Glutamine, vitamins and (low refined carb-sugar) diets have been helpful in therapy for addiction. Paying the medicare for such people and revamping rehab along intelligent operations theory would cost society a lot less in the long run.

Salmon addicted to swimming upstream ...


Mathematician in his own stream




To: koan who wrote (21121)9/15/2006 3:04:13 PM
From: Proud Deplorable  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78419
 
go read it again, you CAN read can't you LOL >G<

what is accomplished by giving pot smokers the death penalty?
I'm not even sure pot is that harmful