Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (303284)	9/15/2006 5:41:12 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 1575939

You don't have to read government manuals all day to understand - "The turnover rates in the bottom four quintiles were at least 60 percent over the period with most of this reflecting upward progress.". Either Christopher Frenze (not really Armey although Frenze was working for Armey) was lying, or he was passing on lies or massive errors that he should have caught (being the senior economist writing the report) and that other people would have easily caught after the report was released, or there was a lot of social mobility over that period. If the data is faulty, but just faulty to a very small extent than the conclusion would still be supported. If the data is totally off base, it would have been caught and it would be easy for any economist or statician to disprove. Where is the data showing that Frenze's report is false? Where is even an argument that its false other than someones post on SI?