Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bilow who wrote (203206)	9/17/2006 6:11:31 AM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

If the collapse of the building was normal, why did not anyone want to look at the rubble and check where things went wrong? Building construction standards authorities would have wanted to go over it with a fine toothed comb. As it happened all the evidence was sealed off and carted away, and nobody was allowed to inspect it. Don't think that's a bit odd in the light of the fact it collapsed at near free fall velocity???

To: Bilow who wrote (203206)	9/17/2006 6:33:57 AM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

From the physorg forum link shown earlier.. ============================================= Fire Engineering magazine's criticism. "Editor-in-chief Manning is calling the present investigation run by the American Society of Civil Engineers "a half-baked farce," and has condemned the destruction of WTC evidence. "For more than three months, structural steel from the World Trade Center has been and continues to be cut up and sold for scrap. Crucial evidence that could answer many questions about high-rise building design practices and performance under fire conditions is on the slow boat to China, perhaps never to be seen again in America until you buy your next car," says Manning" ============================================== also public-action.com