Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (303424)	9/16/2006 10:51:56 PM
From: combjelly	Respond to of 1576997

"It is not yet clear, though, if the evidence of a single year's change represents a trend. " All too correct. A single year means squat. There were less dust storms, which means average temperature was up. Imagine that.

To: longnshort who wrote (303424)	9/16/2006 10:57:08 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1576997

Water or not? The rate of erosion suggests the features are made of moderately dense but solid carbon dioxide, rather than water ice, the scientists conclude. But that does not preclude the possibility of water ice at the south pole. "We don't know what's underneath," Caplinger said. "You could certainly have water ice under carbon dioxide." He said the only way to find out is to go there and drill down. space.com (You forgot to link your source)