Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bilow who wrote (203216)	9/16/2006 11:23:05 PM
From: Doug R	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

YOU have no way of knowing what Pataki "had no way" of knowing. His statements were clear. The post-collapse video and photographic evidence is clear. 600,000 tons of concrete in each tower. A tiny fraction of it in evidence as large pieces. If your anecdotal accounts show that, maybe, 10% of the concrete was in large pieces...so what. The AVERAGE size of all concrete sampled was 30 microns in diameter. There were measurements of particles as small as .3 microns. The calculations were for an average size of 60 microns showing that the tower's available energy was only 1/2 that necessary. The physics professors that worked on this were being generous to the "official" fable. Now we learn more about your obfuscation. After I've TWICE before shown your attempts to "explain" to be entirely fraudulent in their basis, you may now be considered a glutton for punishment. Next we'll tackle the seismic spikes that registered before the planes struck and the corroborating eyewitness accounts of explosions in the basement levels before the planes struck. Independent corroborating evidence, in court, is considered to be a whole that is greater than the sum of the parts because the corroboration works in both directions. There is proof in corroboration. Especially when one piece is as undeniable as the times of the spikes.