Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Earl who wrote (15888)	9/17/2006 10:01:57 PM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20039

My personal favorite is how air compressed by the collapse caused concrete to be pulverized and ejected at high velocity 15 stories ahead of the progression of the collapse, in sequence, all the way down the buildings. As Baby Huey used to say, "Duh, that sounds logical.". And that pancake premise flies right in the face of NIST's conclusions that floors did not fail. The say the floors stayed attached to columns, and the pulling in of the sagging floors buckled the columns. Looks like PM will now have to debunk NIST.

To: Don Earl who wrote (15888)	9/17/2006 10:12:18 PM
From: David Howe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

<<< My personal favorite is how air compressed by the collapse caused concrete to be pulverized and ejected at high velocity 15 stories ahead of the progression of the collapse, in sequence, all the way down the buildings. As Baby Huey used to say, "Duh, that sounds logical." >>> The problem with your thinking on this is that you are wrong, the material ejected was at the point of the collapse, NOT 15 stories ahead of the collapse. I don't know what video you are looking at, but you ought to look a bit closer, use your brain and figure out for yourself that the point of collapse (inside the perimeter columns) is exactly where the material is being ejected.