Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David Howe who wrote (15898)	9/18/2006 1:52:02 AM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20039

If I come across that video again I'll post it to you. It's been posted here before. But it's not exactly handy for me, or I'd point it out to you. Till then you'll just have to take my word for it. There wouldn't be any air pressure 15 floors down out the windows if the floors were still in tact. The video is of the first collapse and less than 15 floors were involved in the collapse. So you couldn't influence the air below, beyond what had collapsed from above. And all that dust. Looks like concrete dust, but from floors that had not collapsed yet. Then if you were developing all that air pressure that would be a resisting force upward, and then by the conservation of momentum the building would have had to have slowed. And one other thing about the air. If it was being blown out the windows from the floors collapsing that same volume of air would have come from up above the falling floors, because nature abhors a vacuum. We'd see that air going down after the building...but what I am seeing is air being boosted upward and away from the collapse zone...no air being drawn down after the collapse.