Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Actual left/right wing discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (1182)	9/18/2006 7:16:41 PM
From: thames_sider	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10087

Apologies, I must read the thread before replying... oh well, it's not as though I'll notice the delay. And congratulations on being the first moderator I've ever seen to moderate himself... disappointed though I am to think that you'd agree with LL that I should face the death penalty, presumably for not agreeing with his every utterance. Perhaps I'd better moderate myself off too.

To: one_less who wrote (1182)	9/18/2006 7:42:29 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10087

If Laz gets suspended for GFY what about thames_sider for calling Laz a fascist. I'm not necessarily saying that thames should be banned but I don't think it should just be one of them. Re: "And you constantly invoke 'fascism' as the enemy. Why IS that, I wonder? Is it perhaps like that closet homosexuality that manifests as homophobia, a desperate attempt to prove what you're not by seeing that evil everywhere else? <edit> a way to divert attention... after all, how could you possibly BE what you rail AGAINST?" --- You could be a group not just Laz personally, but your affiliating Laz with that group with your words. If you want to imply Bush is a fascist than your still making a ridiculous statement but at least you wouldn't be making a personal attack against someone else on the thread.