Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (79437)	9/18/2006 7:44:22 PM
From: sea_biscuit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

In other words, Iraq had "better targets"?! Some of Rummy's wisdom seems to have been rubbed off on to you! :-) Did Dumbyass more or less drop Afghanistan for the same reason? That it had difficult terrain etc.? LOL! And what kind of cease-fire agreement violation by Saddam was it that justified a full-scale invasion, the loss of nearly 3000 US soldiers (tens of thousands more to injuries) and over $300 billion? I am not saying that Dumbyass should have invaded Pakistan. He should not have made an alliance with Pakistan's dictator for two reasons. One, Musharraf is a dictator. And two, Musharraf has had cozy relations with Afghanistan's Taliban and sundry other terrorists. Even more funny is your assertion that Iraq was an easier job. Look at the current mess over there. Or are you among the forelock-tuggers who still religiously believe that things are going fine in Iraq? Also, if you never stated that Iraq was closely tied to Al Qaeda, you have lost the second of the two reasons that were used to brainwash Americans as to why the invasion was justified (after WMDs).