Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: koan who wrote (21401)	9/18/2006 10:56:05 PM
From: loantech	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78404

koan that was uncalled for. Myself I remember Benson investor from way back. No reason to interfere here. EC and I have had words befoe too and we worked it out just fine. They can too. I know about campbell resources and it may have as much or more to offer as my pump QEE both have a lot of shares out. I welcome Benson and am surprised at the post. Maybe it will be better than another pump of mine. Read what que siera just posted. Should I dump on him because he said MMGG may go to 80 cents with tax season around the corner? Anyhow relax we all pump around here. Some of it even has validity. <g>

To: koan who wrote (21401)	9/18/2006 10:57:41 PM
From: BensonInvestor	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 78404

No Koan, I stand my ground. E. Charters posted dismissive, negative sentiment about CCH. You can read his post. But it’s perfectly clear that he didn’t even spend 2 minutes looking at the company before he posted. That showed a blatant, egregious, lack of respect to a newcomer. I don’t care how long he has posted, and how many people like him. Anyone can see that he was running his mouth without having done even the slightest amount of homework. E. Charters was laughing at the company because they couldn’t possibly have enough gold production to make his numbers. It says “Copper” in every report the company produces. This is about right and wrong, not about seniority and pecking order. And (this goes to Koan) – Don’t go calling Campbell a “two bit stock”. You are just as bad. I have posted that Sprott Securities is investing $10 million in Campbell. A recent disclosure statement suggest that 9 separate Sprott funds are getting an allocation. To see that kind of interest to a new issue is unprecedented in this sector. John Embry doesn’t buy “two bit stocks”. I take the time to do my research, before I post something. All posters should operate in a similar manner. Notice how “Loantech” greeted me, when I first posted on Saturday. He asked me to join with a paid subscription. I did exactly that, right after I read his post. That’s honor, Pal. That’s putting your money where your mouth is. And what you call “pumping” isn’t even pumping. “Pumping” is when you write a whole bunch of optimistic stuff on a company, where the words are just exaggerations – they go way beyond what can be backed up with reports. Simply working hard to get the word out (which I am doing) is perfectly honorable, if the analysis is accurate, and can stand on it’s own merits. CCH is trading below it's recent moving averages, so even the price action would suggest a possible good time to buy. And take note that I have now started my own Board, and will be encouraging people to post there. I believe I am 100% within the SiliconInvestor Terms of Use. There is no rule that you can’t “call-out” an old-timer. If I was an outside observer, I would pay a premium for a Poster who took the time to do research, write clearly, explain their case with facts and links, and reply to questions. And I would dismiss the kind of roughshod remarks that E. Charters posted. And I have been perfectly polite in my comments here. You and your friends won’t like my comments, but I believe the facts speak for themselves. Don’t encourage LoanTech to ban me. And you should read my introduction, my first post here. I was cordial, and polite. I was totally open with my motives. Bulls are perfectly welcome in Silicon Investor. But not every Bull can make his or her case. These message board systems are full of people who just write stuff, without doing due diligence, or without even caring about accuracy, or with a specific nefarious goal in mind. I am not accusing E. Charters of being nefarious, just tragically weak in his analysis. It could have been honest mistake, but he wrote it in such a Dismissive manner, that I think his post was brutally unfair. Koan - Why don’t you, or one of friends, take your best shot at finding something wrong with my analysis on Campbell? I would love the challenge. Now if the “friends of E. Charter” can get over this, I will extend my hand, in a hand-shake gesture, and offer to buy the first round of virtual Beer, or Scotch. For everyone. I am sorry I had to write this. But I will always defend my honor, and call a spade a spade. Maybe E. Charters was having a bad day. Fine. But someone had to call him on it. Benson