SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Orcastraiter who wrote (15992)9/19/2006 1:30:00 PM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20039
 
would that work on every floor with all that concrete? would that have to put in boosters? So what about all the sachels of bombs and the nosy office workers??? i know that I would find them.



To: Orcastraiter who wrote (15992)9/19/2006 4:04:48 PM
From: David Howe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20039
 
<<< wireless would be easier. >>>

Except for one thing. It's insane to think that wireless would work reliably enough to be included as part of the master plan. There's so many issues with this; Batteries? Power wired to the receivers, Signal strength?, Signal boosters? Receivers and transmitters buried in walls, or Exposed? Testing to see if the signals are being received? etc. etc.

It's insane. Certainly insane when you compare this to the simple idea that the building structure failed in the area of the fire, buckled columns as the floors fell and the weight of the building collapsed the entire structure. One is easy to believe and one is insanely difficult to believe.