Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (79533)	9/19/2006 8:45:16 PM
From: Proud Deplorable	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

P"resident Bush’s soft approach towards Iran seeking a diplomatic solution has been read as backing down from the hard line of severe economic sanctions. This comes one day after Iran said it had NO intentions of halting enrichment in order to hold talks. That was up on gold yesterday and down on gold and energy today. One might conclude that Iran will succeed in their nuclear plans, whatever they are. It indicates the US has a full inventory of war and if anything is to occur it will be Israel’s decision. Israel does not now seem to be the enormous military power they assumed they were, one that would be able to defeat the entire Middle East in less than 5 days. Their engagement with Hizbollah took care of that. Short term there is a lull, but what does this mean for the longer term geopolitical trend?" Jim Sinclair

To: sea_biscuit who wrote (79533)	9/21/2006 4:08:40 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Not only would there be no insurgency, the people would welcome us with flowers... Right? No, not right, and I never said otherwise. Not in executing them or ending them. Neither you nor I are executing this war. 4 - If you where going to invade Iran it would be easier to do so from Iraq. I see. So when would that invasion begin? Probably never. I don't think its likely, and as I've said before I would be against it. Are you neocon warmongers sending your kids Children are not the property of their parents.