Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lucretius who wrote (326880)	9/19/2006 8:47:46 PM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436259

that chart sucked dude. commodity waste land. you calling a bottom? i don't think the move has worked itself out yet. but saying so prolly means it has.

To: Lucretius who wrote (326880)	9/19/2006 11:01:59 PM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436259

potential for a double / triple bottom if that's what you mean. yad da. but not if its a change in foreward demand thinking. and only when gold decouples, can you get back on that gravy train with certainty. up till now, just more of the speculative craze in price. big fat game. like a pig with lipstick. simmons marked the top with his book when it comes to oil. as i've said before. meaning, he's FOS on the short term, and in fantasy world in the long term... cuz he doesn't have a claim on when. you calling it now? you saying the gold pig is now pretty? no make up?