Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (9488)	9/19/2006 11:15:56 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217754

The expectations are dashed by people who believe as you do, which is leading the world to absolute no good, What a statement from the people who brought us Tiananmen Square and the repeated militant bluster aimed at trying to force millions of Chinese, WHO ALREADY POSSESS DEMOCRACY, to surrender that form of government and reunify with the non-democratic government in Bejing. And now you're engaged in oil deals with Iran's Apocalyptic Ahmadinejad, Hugo Chavez who just "suggested" to the Venezuelan people that they should "permit" him him remain in power for 25 more years. You've permitted your neighbor to the east, North Korea, to possess nuclear weapons on your border. And you're supporting an repressive Islamist Regime in Sudan which is committing genocide against millions of people, all so you can exploit them for their oil. So you tell me TJ.. exactly what "Good" has China's foreign policy brought except the strenghten the grasp on power for any number of wackos around the world? Show me what you can be "proud" of as a result of your foreign policy... and that is precisely why you are ping-ed, seeing as CB is apparently reformed to some extent. Ping-ed?? CB?? I am guessing you do not agree with Captain Kirk and the Star Trek approach to good manners and smart strategy. TJ.. if you were following the "prime directive" you WOULDN'T EVEN BE INVOLVED in these places. Your policy would be strictly "hands off" and that of an observer.. But that's hardly the case now is it.. Not when China is building 3 arms factories in Sudan to supply them with weapons to strengthen their grasp on power. Hawk