Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (9528)	9/20/2006 1:51:55 AM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217703

Hello Hamoon, <<Hong Kong democracy>> ... eh, well, uhm, we do not actually have a one for one voting system, and as the economy is the freest in the world when judged by your heritage foundation, meaning almost perfect, i suspect a one for one system that attempts improvements will, by inference, likely mess up perfection, even if only by enabling electoral-enabled theft. As to ... <<don't be so quick to forget that it was due to protections of Britain and the US that prevented the communist chinese from seizing the colony and providing you the ability to have the such a free economy>> ... I am confused, because by your logic, China will do China wants to do, and so I would have thought what Britain, the colonial master, and its master, the US wants for HK would carry no weight. If so, it then must be because China wants the best for HK, which then of course deserves a vote from me if I had one. Which way is it? When Maurice and you make up your collective mind about Hong Kong's freedom and Tibet's analog, let me know. Chugs, J