To: i-node who wrote (5126 ) 9/20/2006 12:32:13 PM From: pcstel Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 8420 You ARE mistaken. You don't have a freaking clue what you're talking about. Tisk, Tisk, Tisk.. Such inner-Bitterness Mr. Ray. Why are you SO BITTER? I mean, you claimed that MLB content was SO MUCH BETTER THAN SIRI's NFL content. But, as you point out.. XM has NO CONTROL over it content. But, if you say that XM MLB content is superiour. Then that is simply YOUR OPINION.. I am really quite surprised that "kovachs" isn't all over you for presenting your OPINIONS as FACTS on these subjects. Unless of course, he also lacks objectivity and is also BITTER. You try to simplify everything into terms YOU can understand Yeap! I like to keep things simple.. Let's look at the SEC statements, the companies releases, etc.. I try not spin up my own data points based on my own Self-Bitterness or Self-Importance Complex. "How long does a Stern subscriber last? How long does a MLB subscriber last? How much does each cost the company to get? How many subscribers are LOST as a result of the "negatives" associated with Stern? What would be the opportunity cost of either having done something different? There are tens of other issues." LOL! Dude.. You are going to have a hard time sleeping at night with so many things on your mind.. All I know is that SIRI has stated that Stern has brought 1 million Cash paying subscribers. That translates into 156 MILLION a year in Revenue. SIRI states that the cost is 100 million a year (plus incentives). Maybe you consider that a bad investment... vs. MLB? Your remarks have become downright ignorant and worthy of Sirius Rich or rruff. Are those like those "popsicle stand" remarks I have been making for the last 4 years?? It's hard to believe that someone such as yourself that proclaims to be SO RIGHT, has been SO, SO, WRONG. Is that why you are SO BITTER? And so it goes, PCSTEL