Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (16066)	9/20/2006 1:47:09 PM
From: David Howe	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 20039

Sure, more analysis would be nice. The problem is that most people think that the crimes is obvious. The crime of terrorists crashing planes into the buildings which caused a fire and structural damage which when combined eventually caused structural failure and collapse. Before you expect anyone to spend more money investigating this, you're going to have to get people to thinks that there is any chance at all of a massive conspiracy. People will have to believe that it's possible that: 1. Bush planned and executed 9/11 in just a 9 month period. 2. During that short time he convinced hundreds of people to take part in mass murder. People like Trade Center security, families of the airline passengers, several departments of the Military, the CIA, the FBI, Demolition experts, Pentagon camera men, pilots, airlines, flight control supervisors, Air Force staff and supervisors, training simulation supervisors, site cleanup supervisors, etc. etc. 3. After convincing all of these people, they somehow got everything in place in a few months. 4. They planted explosives that were somehow undetected and somehow worked silently and in perfect sequence so that the builings fell in tune with every single detonation so that the detonations didn't actaully appear to be detonations. Nobodies really going to believe this. At least not enough people to justify the type of analysis that you are asking for. 3. After ever