SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Where the GIT's are going -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sandintoes who wrote (120811)9/20/2006 9:25:46 PM
From: Glenn Petersen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 225578
 
A feel good story. Words to live by:

"This old life is what you make of it."

1-arm dove hunt is a tradition in Texas

Tuesday, September 19, 2006

By Susan Warren, The Wall Street Journal

OLNEY, Texas -- With the cuff of his empty blue shirt sleeve tucked inside his belt, Leon Jordan swung his shotgun to his other shoulder and fired a blast of birdshot at a passing flock of doves. He missed, but he didn't blame it on having just one arm. His blind eye threw him off, he said.

Not that it mattered much. Mr. Jordan was taking part in the annual One-Arm Dove Hunt outside this tiny west Texas town, and there weren't too many doves dropping from the sky that day, though an awful lot of one-armed guys were doing their best. "You know, this ain't so bad at all," mused Mr. Jordan, standing at the edge of a field of drying sunflowers in the fading evening light. "This old life is what you make of it."

For 35 years, dozens of men and women from around the country who have lost an arm, or were born without one, have descended on Olney the first weekend after Labor Day to get a dose of life-is-what-you-make-it medicine. It is billed as the most unusual event in Texas, but those who come here think it is more than that. "It was the first time I've ever been to a place where everyone was just like me," said Kelly Lamkin, 35 years old, who was born with one arm unformed below the elbow.

The idea for the One-Arm Dove Hunt was cooked up by Jack Northrup and Jack Bishop at the lunch counter of Olney's Cub Drugstore in 1972. The two men had more than their names in common; they each had an arm amputated at the shoulder. The One-Armed Jacks, as they called themselves, also had a roguish sense of humor.

To get the goat of two eavesdropping strangers, the Jacks began talking loudly about going hunting with their muzzle-loaded shotguns and bolt-action rifles. It was ludicrous because either would be extremely difficult for someone to operate with just one arm. The joke launched the first annual One-Arm Dove Hunt, attended by six Olney men who had lost an arm -- mostly from oil-field accidents -- and a few others who had heard about the hunt through the grapevine.

Its name was an attention-getter, and the One-Arm Dove Hunt grew quickly through word of mouth. So many one-armed people wanted to attend that Messrs. Northrup and Bishop soon expanded the occasion to a two-day event, with a one-arm trap-shooting contest, one-arm horseshoes, cow-chip tossing and a 10-cents-a-finger breakfast the morning of the hunt.

The hunt now has become secondary. People living without the use of an arm gather each year in Olney to exchange personal stories, find friendship and support, and to exchange practical tips for living. The world is engineered for people with two arms, so those without must figure out how to manage nearly every basic living skill, from buttoning their shirt to opening a jar of pickles.

Some attendees, like Ms. Lamkin, were born without an arm. Others suffered accidents that crushed, mangled or severed their arm or hand. Many lost limbs to cancer or other diseases.

"When you cut right through it, there's a lot of pain in this room," said Lisa Roberts, of Norman, Okla., who lost her arm in a 1998 attack by a 900-pound Malayan tapir while she was working as a zookeeper in Oklahoma.

While there are many organizations and events throughout the U.S. geared toward amputees, including sporting events such as fishing, cycling and horse riding, most amputations involve the legs. (That is partly because injuries that destroy an arm often include fatal injuries to vital organs.) The challenges of losing a leg are vastly different from losing an arm, so "upper extremity" amputees say they still can feel isolated.

The Olney event has been unique because it focuses on upper-body amputees.

Other organizations are beginning to get into the act. As more injured soldiers returned from Iraq without arms and hands, the U.S. Army's Walter Reed Hospital launched a rehabilitation program last summer to retrain the wounded soldiers in using firearms, a program that includes hunting trips.

The Olney hunt, attended this year by 80 or so amputees and many friends and relatives, is a way of restoring amputees' confidence and helping them learn that losing an arm doesn't mean giving up the things they used to do with two arms. "Our guns are guns that heal," explained Mr. Northrup, as he punched the button to release another clay pigeon at this year's trap-shooting event.

Taking turns based on their level of disability -- arms missing above-the-elbow or below-the-elbow, as well as a division for double-amputees -- the shooters here have learned there is always a way to get things done. Many have adapted their weapons or fashioned home-made gun-holders and clamps that take the place of an arm. Some simply use their one arm to swing their weapon up to their shoulder, aim and shoot in one swift motion.

Douglas Davis, 36, stood easily on two artificial legs and raised his gun to his shoulder using his two prosthetic arms outfitted with a hook at the end of one and a mechanized clamp on the other. Mr. Davis, of Fredonia, Wis., lost all four limbs to a blood infection in 1995. He attended his first hunt four years ago and hasn't missed one since. Back home, "I can go months without seeing another amputee," Mr. Davis said. But in Olney one weekend a year, "I'm not treated like a guy with no arms."

As a longtime sportsman and hunter, he says he has shot more deer in the years since his amputations than he had shot earlier. When he is sitting in the deer stand on a cold autumn morning, "I don't have to worry about my hands or feet getting cold," he noted.

The two one-armed Jacks, Mr. Bishop, 84, and Mr. Northrup, 71, have become celebrities to those attending the weekend event. Fellow amputees crowded around them for introductions this year and asked them to pose for pictures. The Jacks sat on toilets used as targets for the cow-chip-tossing contest.

After lunch, there was bingo for the nonhunters, while the hunters piled into their pickup trucks and drove out to the dove-hunting site. Bill and Kay Combel, of Farmersville, Texas, parked along the edge of a field and settled down to watch for doves flying by. Mr. Combel, 61, who was born with only one, semiformed arm, has been coming to the hunt for 29 years. In the early days, he sat on the ground and used his foot to hold his gun so he could pull the trigger with his one arm. Several years ago, a friend made him a special harness with an attachment to hold the gun. Now he says he can "stand and shoot like a man."

The doves didn't have much to worry about. Several birds flew over without a single shot from the one-arm hunters arrayed around the edge of the field. Even when the hunters did shoot, the birds faced good odds of surviving. "You'll see one little bird flying over and you'll hear five thousand shots and that little bird will just keep flapping along," Mrs. Combel said.

At another field farther down the road, the hunters were having mixed luck. With the doves thick in the air, Robert Ratliff, missing both arms, tied a rubber tube around the barrel of his gun and slid his hook into the knot to stabilize it, then used his other hook to pull the trigger. He bagged eight birds in the first two hours.

Meanwhile, 58-year-old John Barrett of Delaware, who lost his right arm at the age of eight, sat contentedly with his shotgun at his side and no birds in sight. "If you come here for the doves," he said, "you've come here for the wrong reason."

post-gazette.com



To: sandintoes who wrote (120811)9/20/2006 9:57:52 PM
From: KLP  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 225578
 
Actually, one of our members found there WAS a free lunch. We had a special deal this year. I wanted to have as many as possible to send their dues in on time, so had a little contest. For those that did, their name went into a hat, and we drew at the next Board....The gal whose name was drawn is a WONDERFUL member, and always does so much behind the scenes....I was so happy that her name was the one drawn for the 'free lunch'....



To: sandintoes who wrote (120811)9/21/2006 12:09:35 AM
From: calgal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 225578
 
Poll numbers moving GOP's way
By Donald Lambro
Wednesday, September 20, 2006

Email It
Print It
Take Action Book Club

Read Article & Comments (36) Trackbacks(0) Post Your Comments

WASHINGTON -- President Bush and his party seem to be succeeding in their efforts to define the strategic security issues that will likely decide the outcome of the 2006 midterm elections.

Nowhere is this more apparent than Bush's campaign offensive to warn Americans of the still-potent dangers of yet another terrorist attack on the United States and his implicit claim that Republicans are far better able to deal with that threat than the left-wing, antiwar leaders in the Democratic Party.

U.S. President George W. Bush (R) makes a point as he talks with the leaders at his table during a luncheon hosted by U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan in honor of the heads of state and government attending the 61st General Assembly session at United Nations headquarters in New York, September 19, 2006. Mexican President Vicente Fox is at left. REUTERS/Chip East (UNITED STATES) That offensive has moved the numbers in the GOP's direction, with the help of Democratic leaders whose national-security agenda, such as it is, seems opposed to every anti-terrorism program Bush has implemented in the ensuing war on terrorism: reauthorization of the Patriot Act, the electronic-surveillance efforts to intercept terrorist calls into the United States and now the tough -- but also humane -- interrogation practices that have foiled numerous terrorist plots against us.

Like the Democrats, Bush and the Republicans are trying to nationalize this election, too, but the contrast between how the two major parties look at the terrorism issue could not be sharper or more alarming.

Moreover, the available evidence suggests the GOP seems to be doing a more effective job of it, according to a recent survey of voters by independent pollster John Zogby.

Significantly, Zogby found that "voters planning on casting ballots for Republicans are more likely than those voting for Democrats to say they are casting their ballot based on national issues by a 79 percent to 69 percent margin."

And what issue will move the most voters? Zogby said, "Another positive development for Congressional Republicans is that one in four of their supporters -- 23 percent -- consider terrorism the top issue as they go to the polls, easily the top issue for those backing the GOP."

But among voters who say they will support the Democrats, "terrorism barely registers 4 percent," he said.

The White House is betting that the threat of terrorism, and the GOP's advantage on the core question of who can keep us safer, will trump the Democrats on Election Day. And with polls showing the Democrats are still getting failing grades on this key security issue, that's a fairly safe bet right now.

Public perceptions and defining your opponent are at the heart of good politics and effective campaigns, and the president has effectively driven the Democrats into a corner on their weakest issue: national security.