SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Truth About Islam -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Oral Roberts who wrote (1260)9/21/2006 11:10:08 AM
From: Proud_Infidel  Respond to of 20106
 
Muslim rebel leader welcomes Thailand's coup
AP via The Star, Malaysia ^ | 09/21/2006

thestar.com.my

BANGKOK (AP) - An exiled Muslim rebel leader on Thursday welcomed Thailand's military overthrow of Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra, saying the coup could help resolve a bloody Islamic insurgency in the country's south.

"It is the right thing that the military has taken power to replace the Thaksin Shinawatra government,'' said Lukman B. Lima, an exiled leader in one of several groups fighting the central government for a separate Muslim state.

"We hope that the political (situation) can be resolved under Gen. Sondhi Boonyaratkalin as the new leader,'' Lukman said.

In an e-mailed response to questions from The Associated Press, Lukman said that Sondhi was the "only one who knows the real problems'' of the Muslim-dominated provinces of southern Thailand.

Lukman, exiled in Sweden, is vice president of the Pattani United Liberation Organization, or PULO.

"We will continue to fight until full independence (is attained) in Pattani,'' he said, referring to the provinces of Pattani, Yala and Narathiwat.

Sondhi, 59, had proposed several weeks ago opening talks with the separatists, but Thaksin's government vehemently opposed such a move.

"Thaksin's government has totally failed to quell the violence, so we are pinning our hope on the Council of Administrative Reform,'' said Srisompob Jitpiromsri, a political scientist from Prince of Songkhla University in the southern province of Pattani.

The deposed premier, accused by the coup-makers of corruption and other wrongdoing, said meanwhile in London that the rapid, bloodless overthrow of his government late Tuesday while he was abroad was totally unexpected.

The takeover by army commander Gen. Son Boonyaratkalin, a Muslim in a predominantly Buddhist country, received the endorsement of Thailand's revered king and of many Thais eager for an end to political turmoil.

But Western governments called it a blow to democracy.

"I left Thailand as the prime minister and now I am a jobless man,'' Thaksin said in London, according to a Thai reporter who accompanied him on a flight from New York where the former premier was attending the U.N. General Assembly.

"Nevermind, I can still keep in touch with my family,'' Thaksin told the reporter.

"Everyone is fine. I have no problems with the coup makers.''

The reporter spoke on condition of anonymity, citing her company's policy.

Thaksin arrived in London on Wednesday.

It was not known whether he would seek to stay there, where he has a residence, or return to Thailand, where he could face prosecution for corruption.

Thaksin, who used an iron-fisted policy in trying to suppress the insurgency, was widely detested in southern Thailand and many moderate Muslims said that the bloody conflict could never be solved as long as he remained in power.

Sondhi has said he would serve as de facto prime minister for two weeks and then the junta, which calls itself the Council of Administrative Reform, will choose a civilian to replace him.

A constitution is to be drawn up and elections held in one year's time.

The military leader recieved the imprimatur Wednesday of revered King Bhumibol Adulyadej, which should effectively quash any efforts at resistance by Thaksin's partisans.

Thaksin's ouster followed a series of missteps that prompted many to accuse the prime minister of challenging the king's authority - an unpardonable act in this traditional Southeast Asian nation that is a popular vacation destination for Westerners.

Many Thais appeared relieved at the resolution of political tensions festering since the beginning of the year, when street demonstrations demanding Thaksin step down for alleged corruption and abuse of power gained momentum.

Thailand has had no working legislature and only a caretaker government since February, when Thaksin dissolved parliament to hold new elections in an effort to reaffirm his mandate.

The presence of tanks and armed soldiers on the streets of Bangkok, a city of more than 10 million, was taken with good humor in an almost holiday atmosphere.

The bloodless nature of the coup gave hope that the effects on Thailand's large tourist industry might be minimal.

Schools, government offices and the stock market were closed Wednesday but reopened Thursday when Bangkok's notorious traffic jams returned with a vengeance.

The U.S. government denounced the coup, Thailand's first in 15 years, and hinted that U.S. aid, military cooperation and improved trade relations might be in jeopardy.

"It is a step backward for democracy,'' State Department deputy spokesman Tom Casey said.

The European Union demanded "that the military forces stand back and give way to the democratically elected political government.''

The International Monetary Fund, which bailed Thailand and some of its neighbors out of a financial crisis in the late 1990s, believed the region would be little affected, said the IMF's chief, Rodrigo de Rato.

Although Thaksin handily won three general elections, opponents accused him of emasculating democratic institutions, including packing the state Election Commission with cronies and stifling media that were once among Asia's freest



To: Oral Roberts who wrote (1260)9/21/2006 11:13:01 AM
From: Proud_Infidel  Respond to of 20106
 
Turkish writer in court for book controversy (about Armenian genocide)
Radio Netherlands ^ | 09/20/2006 | Dorian Jones

radionetherlands.nl

Turkey is once again sending a controversial message to Europe about its views on human rights. In the past year many of the country's leading writers and journalists have been prosecuted because of speeches and writings that "denigrate Turkishness". But next week, for the first time, an author is on trial not for what she wrote, but rather for the words spoken by a fictional character in her latest novel. The author, Elif Safak, faces six months in jail if convicted.

In a café in central Istanbul Elif Safak receives words of support from customers. She is one of the most well-known of Turkey's new generation of writers, who have led the way in challenging the country's social taboos.

Character

Her latest book is a heady combination of sexual abuse and memories of an historical tragedy. But now she is facing a possible jail sentence. Safak is being prosecuted for a speech made by a character in her latest book - a speech that accuses Turks of committing genocide against the Armenians 90 years ago. Prosecutors believe the novel violates Article 301 of the country's penal code, which criminalises insults against Turkishness. Safak says the case is another worrying step in the silencing of expression in Turkey. "I think it is so absurd, it is so surreal, because we are talking about a work of fiction, we are talking about a novel. Until today Article 301 has been used as a weapon to silence many people, but in another sense my case is very unusual because it is fiction."

"If Article 301 is going to be interpreted like this, we cannot write novels in this country anymore, you cannot do movies in this country anymore."

Article 301

Nationalists tried to attack writer Perihan Magdan while she attended her court case earlier this year. Magdan, like Safak, was prosecuted for her writings. In the last year, Article 301 has been used in 80 cases filed against writers and journalists. In all the cases they were filed not by the state but by individual nationalist lawyers.

Most of the cases have ended in acquittal and no one has been jailed. But the prosecutions have led to growing criticism by the European Union - making it a sensitive issue because Turkey is seeking to join the EU. Earlier this month a European Parliament report sharply criticised Turkey. Joost Lagendijk (see photo) the head of the European Parliamentary committee on Turkey and a Dutch MEP says the country has to change its ways. "The best thing would be for the government to take an initiative and bring forward the change in the penal code to parliament and delete the whole article. But they say, look at the end result, there is an acquittal in most cases, so there is an ongoing debate. But I am trying to convince them. There are a still a lot of cases and new cases are opened."

Recall

Later this month the Turkish parliament is due to be recalled early from summer recess to pass EU reforms. But changing Article 301 is not a priority, according to EU membership minister Ali Babacan. He says Brussels should be patient. "We strongly believe that this will be resolved in time but it is not easy, because the political reforms are easier to do on paper. It is sometimes easier to just pass the law through the parliament, do the constitutional amendments. But also it is a reform in the mentality, it is cultural change that we have to go through which is naturally taking time."

But Elif Safak doesn't have time on her side. She has to stand trial. In a sad twist of fate, she is due to give birth on the very day she's due in court. But she says if she can, she will attend the hearing. Tough day Safak is now bracing herself for what she expects to be a tough day. "The worst thing about this trial is not the actual trial itself but the jingoist, the nationalist discourse surrounding it. As you walk inside the courtroom, people are waiting outside chanting slogans, using verbal and physical violence. Those things are very unnerving and those are things that makes one feel lonely and vulnerable and that is the part that hurts most."

The prosecution of Safak will be another blow to Turkey's record on human rights. There is growing concern in Brussels that Ankara has lost its appetite for reform. With every new prosecution questions are likely to continue to grow over whether EU membership talks can continue with Turkey.



To: Oral Roberts who wrote (1260)9/21/2006 11:16:03 AM
From: Proud_Infidel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20106
 
Stoning Women to Death
Village Voice ^ | September 17th, 2006 | Nat Hentoff

villagevoice.com

On June 29, 2006, a court in the Islamic Republic of Iran sentenced Malak Ghorbany, a 34-year-old mother of two, to a brutal death by stoning after finding her guilty of adultery. . . . Two men who were found guilty of murder in the same court were only given jail sentences of six years. . . . The size of the stones used during the execution are required to be . . . not so large that they would kill a woman too quickly, nor so small that they would fail to cause serious injury or pain . — A letter, unanswered, to George W. Bush from John Whitehead, head of the Rutherford Institute, one of the nation's premier civil liberties organizations. The part about the stones is from Article 104 of the Iranian penal code.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the president of Iran, has become an international celebrity, brandishing his nuclear program—and his yearning to wipe Israel off the face of the earth. He is visited by such personages as U.N. secretary-general Kofi Annan and Mike Wallace of 60 Minutes. In their conversations with him, neither has asked the swashbuckling leader about "honor killings" by the government of women charged with having committed "adultery."

As human rights lawyer Lily Mazahery, president of the Legal Rights Institute reports, "in 99 percent of these cases, the accused women have received no legal representation because, under the Shariah legal system, their testimony is at best worth only half the value of the testimony of men."

And there is no single executioner. These are mass murders by stone-throwing members of the community, having the kind of festive time common among American mass lynchers of blacks, when the murderers brought their children to join in the fun. In Iran too, kids are present to witness the sinners' redemption.

The capital crime of adultery, Mazahery has explained to World Net Daily, "includes [under Shariah law] any type of intimate relationship between a girl/woman and a man to whom she is not permanently or temporarily married. Such a relationship does not necessarily mean a sexual relationship.

"Further, charges of adultery are routinely issued to women/girls who have been raped—and they are sentenced to death." (Their unpardonable crime is to have been raped.)

During the continuous coverage in this country of Iran's nuclear threat and its crucial support of terrorists in Iraq and elsewhere in the Middle East, there has been scarcely any mention of this horrifying dimension of the culture of Iran: sangsar, the stoning to death of women.

Mazahery, the Persian American lawyer whose mission has long been to save Iranian women from this and other brutal treatment, tells me that sangsar, "dating back to the dark ages," was, for a time, suspended by the pre-revolutionary regime due to pressure from international human rights organizations, combined with protests from civilized persons around the world. But when the mullahs took over in the 1979 revolution, they brought back Shariah law, and when this president came to power, he reinstituted public stonings, as a "religious principle," against women.

As of this writing, President Ahmadinejad is on his way to address the United Nations in New York. There will be heavy press coverage. Will any reporter ask him about the stoning of women in his country—and the particular case of Malak Ghorbany? And while former "moderate" Iranian president Mohammad Khatami has been in the United States—lecturing at Harvard, among other prestigious venues—I know of no reporter who has asked him to discourse on the stoning of women under his successor.

Mazahery, who was recently invited by students and faculty to respond to Khatami at Harvard, has written and circulated an online petition, "Save Malak Ghorbany From Death by Public Stoning," addressed to Kofi Annan; the U.N.'s commissioner of human rights; and Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran; as well as to the head of its judiciary, Ayatollah Mahmoud Shahroudi.

So far, there have been more than 11,000 signatories—from around the world, including this country, China, and most tellingly, Iran. For Iranians to sign took much courage. As Ali Afshari and Akbar Atri—founding members of Iranian Students for Democracy and Human Rights—revealed in the September 2–3 Wall Street Journal:

"Satellite dishes are being collected to cut off public access to the . . . news of the global community. Women's groups, labor organizations, and student groups are not permitted even the more peaceful acts of protest."

As a result, however, of growing international concern about Malak Ghorbany, partly from Mazahery's petition, the Islamic regime has stayed her execution until she gets a new trial. But as Mazahery points out, Iran has used this three-card-monte trick before. As she told World Net Daily: "It is quite possible the Islamic regime will schedule a rush sham trial and reissue the same sentence [and] even with a new trial, Ghorbany would still receive the same sentence or be sentenced to death by public hanging instead."

The pressure to save Malak Ghorbany must continue. The direct link to Malak's petition, where you can sign on, is petitiononline.com/Malak/petition.html. For related topics, and to link to videos of actual public stonings, click on savemalak.googlepages.com/home.

Keep in mind, Mazahery warns,"There are no scheduled dates for such killings in Iran. A prisoner can be executed at any time with little or no notice at all. Needless to say, that makes matters that much more complicated and urgent in these types of cases."

I shall return to this ongoing story and to Mazahery, whose own personal story illuminates the barbarism of the rulers of Iran—where scores of student dissenters are in prison and, as Ali Afshari and Akbar Atri report, "the noose has been tightened around the neck of writers, journalists, and bloggers in the past few months."