Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (303904)	9/21/2006 7:42:45 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1571678

LIES! How dare you post that piece of misleading propaganda. In no way did Clinton ever say he was offered Osama Bin Laden. Shame on your for parroting this smear campaign lie. And as if Sandy Berger is "discredited". How dare you. Berger was the point man stopping the 1999 Al Qaida LAX bombing. Discredited my ass. The only presdient who had Osama Bin Laden where he wanted him was Bush at Tora Bora. and he let him go. That's a fact. The freerepublic has nothing to do with freedom except exploiting its freedom of speech by LYING.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (303904)	9/21/2006 9:23:41 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571678

Typical Newsmax just making it up again. On page 109 of its report, the Commission states: "Sudan’s minister of defense, Fatih Erwa, has claimed that Sudan offered to hand Bin Ladin over to the United States. The Commission has found no credible evidence that this was so." and In fact, prior to Sudan's attempts to hand the al Qaida mastermind over In the same article.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (303904)	9/22/2006 12:08:47 AM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571678

Brumar, your own smearpost said it "no credible evidence" to back up anything Newsmax or FreeRepublic fabricates. As usual. But when has Newxsmax ever given a damn about facts or evidence? Never. Also, it takes Clinton's statement about 1996 out of context. Clinton did not have any evidence in 1996 to go after OBL right after the African attacks. AL Qaida had only begun to exist then. But he sure as hell did a few years later and went after OBL with 150 Cruise missiles while the rightwing congressmen were mocking him for it. The rightwing though Clinton was trying to duistract the nation from Monica Lewinsky, remember? Ha ha. Clinton was never offered Osama by Sudan. Never happened. And Sandy Berger is not discredited. He's a much better national security advisor than we've had since. He actually stopped a huge Al Qaida attack inside the US just 20 miles from my home. Rice and Hadley haven't stopped jack. So screw you and your lying rightwing blowhards. 9-11 happened on Bush's watch because he was asleep at the wheel. It had nothing to do with Clinton.