Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: American Spirit who wrote (303929)	9/22/2006 12:45:19 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 1573144

Clinton's regulations are not "expensive", they were there to protect the country One thing does not follow from the other. As I said in my post, some of them were probably reasonable, or even desirable, but it doesn't change the fact that they are expensive. It might be a cost worth paying but its still a cost. And I don't think its reasonable to assert that the cost is worth it for all of Clinton's regulations. Bush's atrocious lie that the Kyoto Treaty would destroy our economy Did he say that? Can you give a link, or even an exact quote? My guess is you can't. He may have accurately said that it would be a burden on the economy, but "burden" is hardly the same thing as "destroy". As for new jobs. Clinton didn't create them, but at least he didn't keep the job creation from happening.