SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (303963)9/22/2006 12:57:18 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574006
 
"A lot of the overhead for government provided health care isn't counted in the figures for their costs."

So is your claim that those costs would push the government's cost up by an order of magnitude or more?



To: TimF who wrote (303963)9/24/2006 2:25:28 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574006
 
With a public system there would still be horror stories, waiting for care, denial of expensive care etc.

But at least you get treated and at the end of the day, you still have insurance.

Which is better, Tim..........no insurance or less than exciting public insurance?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News