Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. (XMSR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (2844)	9/22/2006 7:20:29 PM
From: pcstel	Respond to of 3386

That's all you've got. It is interesting that your arguments have degenerated into nothing but personal attacks. Speaks volumes. You keep talking about "personal attacks". Yet, you are the one that makes statements like.. "As I said, you have no idea what you're talking about. " Message 22834555 Or this beauty... "Your remarks have become downright ignorant and worthy of Sirius Rich or rruff." LOL!! It's a "personal attack" Hat-trick.. So much Bitterness and and contempt in Mr. Rays soul. Why are you so BITTER Mr. Ray? LOL!! As a matter of fact.. Here is an interesting post of yours. To: pcstel who wrote (5129) 9/20/2006 1:52:45 PM From: AliasNotAvailable Read Replies (1) of 5197 All I know is that SIRI has stated that Stern has brought 1 million Cash paying subscribers. Sirius has never stated any such thing. At 1M new subscribers Stern is such an obvious loser they would NEVER admit to only having generated 1M subs. It is funny that so many on this thread have to resort to personal attacks because they don't have a command of the facts. Message 22831186 *************************************** Yet, when it came down to the actual FACTS. It was Mr. Ray who didn't have command of the facts. Because as I later posted this post in which a Sirius spokesman directly accredited Stern with 1.1 million new subscriber adds. siliconinvestor.com In which I responded "Not near as funny as thinking that you have command of the facts, when in reality, you only have command of your own OPINIONS, that you have somehow convinced yourself are the FACTS. (SEE ABOVE FOR AN EXAMPLE)!! LOL!" Now it appears that when other people directly provide data points that prove that Mr. Ray simply makes things up and claims them as FACTS. That Mr. Ray considers that a "personal attack". Mr. Ray... The fact that you have become so personally attached to a given company. This does not mean that you can just make up a bunch of shyte (as one poster calls it) and try and pass it off as a FACT. Because someone is going to call you on your mis-informaiton, as I do.. Maybe, many people don't have the time to track down the validity of the tripe you present as FACTS. But, when someone actualy does, and then finds the crap you present as FACTS as being your OPINIONS. You should not cosider this as a personal attack. They are simply attempting to correct the mis-information you provide by the truck load. In other words.. If you didn't spend so much of your time presenting your OPINIONS as FACTS. People would not have to track down the correct data to rebuke your made up data. I am sorry if you take this personally. Maybe you can try and post FACTS instead of your SPECULATION presented as FACTS. That way I won't have to show everyone that you are not presenting FACTUAL DATA. Which in turn you will not feel as though you are receiving "personal attacks". And so it goes, PCSTEL