SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (5573)9/23/2006 3:11:03 PM
From: American Spirit  Respond to of 224729
 
Afghanistan is becoming a disaster again, you dishonest nitwit. There's no victory there. Bush was a premature ejaculator. Bush let Osama Bin LAden get away at Tora Bora despite the pleadings of the CIA for troops to cut off his escape. He also allowed the Taliban to come back and build up a narco state supplying half the world's heroin. Now we badly need more troops in Afghanistan and we don't have them. They're all stuck in Iraq, or wounded, or dead.

Zarqawi was basically invited into Iraq by Bush when he said "bring it on!". Reports are that Al Qaida itself gave up Zarqawi in exchange for leniency against them in Pakistan and Afghanistan. And now Pakistan is protecting Al Qaida and the Taliban leaders. Why? Because Bush didn't finish the job when he had the chance. We're all glad Zarqawi is dead but he was a product of Bush's invasion, and killing him didn't change anything. We have more violence in Iraq than we did before he was killed.

You're right, everyone loves America but most people strongly distrust and deplore Bush, and for damn good reasons. A whole long obvious list of them. And one of the biggest is his deplorable lies and war in Iraq and his hypocrisy when it comes to fighting a phony war on terror vs. a real one. A real war on terror wouldn't involve invading Iraq it would focus our resources against actual terrorists, starting with Bin Laden.