SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. (XMSR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kovachs who wrote (2876)9/24/2006 6:16:56 PM
From: kovachs  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3386
 
Pcstel,
So why does Sirius lose more money than XM despite having "lower" churn than XM, and with stern being "profitable" accordingto you. An "expert" on subscriptions models such as yourself should be able to explain that.



To: kovachs who wrote (2876)9/24/2006 6:17:04 PM
From: i-node  Respond to of 3386
 
If Stern is "profitable" and Sirius has "less" churn, and higher REVPAR than XM how is it that they lose hundreds of millions of dollars more than XM at the same subscriber levels?

The inescapable bottom line.



To: kovachs who wrote (2876)9/24/2006 6:57:43 PM
From: pcstel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3386
 
even though retail CPGA is lower than OEM CPGA for Sirius.

Those your opinions?? Or are they FACTS?

PCSTEL


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News