SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (304335)9/25/2006 2:26:17 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571598
 
LIAR. CLinton was never offered Bin Laden. He was not refering to that during that speech. He was refering to his ability to go in and try and arrest Bin LAden before he had the intel to back up OBL's responsibility for the embassy bombings. But as soon as Clinbton confirmed OBL was behind them he went after him aggressively, spending hundreds of millions of dollars to do so. He narrowly missed him several times, but he definitely tried hard, and was mocked for trying by the rightwingers in congress. The same jackoffs who are lying to claim he didn't do enough now.



To: Brumar89 who wrote (304335)9/25/2006 11:39:31 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1571598
 
What is wrong with you people? We don't want to hear your BS tapes or arguments. We want to know why you can't Bush capture bin Laden? Its been a long time......TP has the number of days.....since we've tried. Why are you attacking Clinton when your president, the guy you voted for twice, has not been able to find the guy.........and doesn't look like he's trying very hard. Stop blaming others for your screwups!


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News