Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (304514)	9/26/2006 4:48:24 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1572211

The Rankings Monday, September 12, 2005 12:01 a.m. EDT In February and March 2005, the Federalist Society and The Wall Street Journal asked an ideologically balanced group of 130 prominent professors of history, law, political science and economics to rate the presidents on a 5-point scale, with 5 meaning highly superior and 1 meaning well below average. Eighty-five scholars responded, and the presidents are ranked in order of mean score, adjusted to give equal weight to Democratic- and Republican-leaning respondents. I'd sure as hell like to see who this "ideologically balanced group" consisted of that would put Bush ahead of Clinton in terms of performance. And if I were doing a survey of this sort I wouldn't used the ideologically challenged WSJ to pick the group that would make that evaluation.........not in a million years. BTW that post was lost on shortie. Way, way too complicated.....but then, you weren't posting it for shortie's benefit. ;-)