SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Contrarian Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Johnny Canuck who wrote (358)9/26/2006 2:26:48 AM
From: pcyhuang  Respond to of 4080
 
TEVA

I think TEVA could be interesting if it breaks the $30 level with capitulated volume

pcyhuang



To: Johnny Canuck who wrote (358)9/26/2006 2:54:53 PM
From: Logain Ablar  Respond to of 4080
 
Hi Harry:

I don't have an edgar account but would want to read the Perdue settlement on Teva and Endo.



To: Johnny Canuck who wrote (358)9/26/2006 10:35:25 PM
From: pcyhuang  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4080
 
Harry:

What you said have some merits. But partly for those reasons, I think BVF qualifies as an interesting contrarian investment. Here is a report from a analyst with a CFA qualification.

---

A Value Stock In A Growth Industry (BVF)

Full Story:

advisor.investopedia.com

In days past, pharmaceutical companies were the bluest of blue chips, renowned for their high return on equity and persistent revenue and earnings growth. An investor who purchased shares of Pfizer (PFE), Merck (MRK), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), or Wyeth (WYE) in 1986 and held through
the present would have easily outpaced the S&P 500.

But that was then and this is now. More contemporary purchases would have disappointed. Indeed, Pfizer shares purchased five years ago and held through the present would be underwater and would have fallen far short of the S&P 500.

Industry dynamics have changed, to be sure: health care providers are aggressively pushing generic alternatives and blockbuster drugs are fewer and far in between. Girth is another mitigating factor. The three largest American drug companies – Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, and Merck –
posted total 2005 revenues of $125 billion, meaning blockbuster drugs have to bust even larger blocks to impact the income statement.

The pharmaceutical industry is still a growth industry and will remain one into the foreseeable future for the simple, well-documented reason the aging baby-boomer demographic is an exemplar of poor fitness and lousy eating habits; hence, their reliance on pharmaceuticals will only increase in coming years.

To capture a meaningful percentage of this growth, investors should look beyond the behemoths to the smaller confreres. On this front, I like Biovail (BVF), a billion dollar, Canada-based pharmaceutical best known for its antidepressant Wellbutrin and herpes treatment Zovirax.

Biovail has performed admirably through 2006. In the second quarter, the company reported net income of $80.6 million, or 50 cents a share, up from $3.7 million, or 2 cents a share, for the year-ago period. What’s more, the company recently backed its 2006 earnings per share target of $2.30 to $2.40. Based on these projections, Biovail sports a paltry forward price-to-earnings ratio of 6.50.

Cash generation is another attribute. At the end of 2005, Biovail had cash and cash equivalents of $445 million, up from $34.3 million a year earlier, giving it an unheard of quick ratio of nearly three.

Given Biovail’s stellar financial performance and amble liquidity, why, then, is its stock trading at a 47% discount to its 52-week high? In short, uncertainty over Wellbutrin, which accounts for 38% of sales.

Biovail suffered a major setback in August when a U.S. District Court ruled that Anchen Pharmaceuticals' generic version of Wellbutrin did not infringe on Biovail’s patents. A subsequent setback was suffered in September when Biovail’s request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against the FDA to prevent it from granting market
approval of generic versions of Wellbutrin was rejected, essentially clearing the path for Anchen to enter the market.

I believe investor reaction to both rulings is overdone. Yes, the competition will hinder Wellbutrin revenue growth – perhaps even stall it – but it won’t eliminate its contribution to the top line. Moreover, Biovail is no one-trick pony. During 2005, the company received six new
product approvals to treat such ubiquitous maladies as pain, diabetes, depression, and insomnia. Growth in Zovirax and Ultram, a pain reliever manufactured for Johnson & Johnson, should continue unabated.

Given its copious cash account, its 3.4% dividend yield, its low P/E ratio and stock price, investor antipathy, and growth potential, Biovail presents a compelling investment for patient, sanguine investors.

By Stephen P. Brown, Contributor - Investopedia Advisor
Stephen P. Brown is a Chartered Financial Analyst, former equity analyst, investor, and freelance financial writer living in Brighton, Colorado. His work has been published in Barron's, CFA Magazine, Wealth Manager Magazine, and The Denver Post.

pcyhuang