Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : SLJB - Sulja Brothers Building Supply, Inc. (Bulls Board) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SOROS who wrote (745)	9/26/2006 11:12:40 AM
From: Patricia Meaney	Respond to of 1521

If you feel more comfortable going with your gut then that is the way to go. You didn't lose anything, and now you can sleep nights. If the financials come out and everything is Kosher, you can jump back in - probably at a higher price, but at least you will feel more secure about your decision.

To: SOROS who wrote (745)	9/26/2006 11:14:09 AM
From: jmhollen	Respond to of 1521

Based on your personal concerns, perhaps you did the right thing for yourself, as you will always be able to re-enter SLJB once the audited financials have been presented (..week+/-..); albeit at higher prices.... There are two things you may have overlooked. (1) The PR about the cement deal resulted in a tremendous amount of phone harassment to SLJB's client which fortunately did not harm the final deal. (2) KPMG is an international entity of multiple divisions/regions, hence their offices in Canada or the EU do not have access to client databases in the USA, etc.; ...ditto for other KPMG regions. It has been graphically and repeatedly pointed out to the HQ that their lack of easy public access to staff and IR people is a real problem. Especially, while the company remains on the Pinks and continues to be an object of intense BashHole attention and Sleazer manipulation. The most obvious result is that every available lead from their PRs is tracked down like the object of an America's Most Wanted episode. That has resulted in knee-jerk 'gag orders' being issued all around. This situation will probably not change until the audit has been published, the OTCBB has been achieved, and a Pro PR outfit on the Street has been hired. If someone can't take the heat in the meantime then it's probably best for them to get out of the kitchen for a while. Good luck. See you back later. John :-) .

To: SOROS who wrote (745)	9/26/2006 12:56:55 PM
From: rrufff	Respond to of 1521

I commend you on both your trading success and your making decisions on your own DD. I do note that the stock now is at .12, up at the high of the day. What concerns me on a stock like this, that is "hot," and subject to very determined bashing, that many sold at the lows of the day at .10, largely as a result of disinformation campaign put out by wormie NASD suspended and fined bashers and sheeple who patrol boards spewing their disinformation with one-line comments, quite moronic in content. For example, I've read many posts by so-called pro bashers who don't seem to know the difference between authorized shares and outstanding shares. They speak of dilution as being a function of "authorized" shares, when, in fact, that is the legal term which expresses the maximum number from which shares are issued and outstanding. Authorized shares are not issued shares. Bashing 101. Nobody knows whether or not the audits come through as promised. All we have is the PR's and we have speculation and posts both ways. I've seen many posts and had PM's that claim the opposite of what you posted. I tend to disregard all this at this point, both the ones that claim the audit is done and those that claim there is no relationship with a particular auditor. I do believe that an auditor would not give official information out, given the confidential and securities sensitive nature of this data. Again, you made the right decision with respect to your own trading style. You didn't listen to the bulls and you didn't listen to the bashers. Congratulations.

To: SOROS who wrote (745)	9/26/2006 3:06:06 PM
From: atm_prophet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1521

Concerning calling about the audit ... I don't think you will find any info from any of the audit companies ... (post from IHUB)... So to make a decision to buy or sell based on conversations that give NO INFORMATION is not confirmation or rebuttal... Posted by: DaFloorGuy In reply to: picantel who wrote msg# 97822 Date:9/26/2006 2:59:30 PM Post #of 97893 Ok, I have called 3 KPMG offices. I did NOT use the number you posted. I did a google search for KPMG, and called the NY office number posted (212-909-5600), and also the Greensboro, NC office (336-275-3394) and a third (201-505-3543) I forget what the title of this office was or where. Here is what I found out. It is company wide policy that they may NOT provide ANY information about any customer they are working for. They could not tell me yes OR no, about any dealings they may have with any company. This is a company wide policy, and I was told that violating it would be grounds for termination for any employee that did so. Sooooo...tell me again how you were told that Sulja was NOT a customer of KPMG..... By the way my name and number was taken by the office at the third number I listed (which was actually the first one I called) and told that someone would be calling me back. Although I expect the same response. I''m not the smartest cookie.....but I''m not one of the crumbs at the bottom either.