Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Actual left/right wing discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (1788)	9/26/2006 11:51:17 AM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10087

I suggest you request that he make the case for relevance too. Israel is a sovereign state recognized by the world and is not going away. And no national politician is advocating that we change our relationship with them.

To: one_less who wrote (1788)	9/27/2006 4:53:30 PM
From: Richnorth	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10087

Thank you for telling me. However, I wish you had told me who my accusers were. For the time being, I just can't help thinking they are sneaky, cowardly and miserable critters or maybe, they are mischievous individuals who are just up to no good, or they are just being paranoid or possessed of a self-persecution complex. I hope I am wrong and that their behaviour was prompted by nothing more than the desire, a la crybabies, to have an indulgent "Gem of a Mom" soothe and pacify them. I am an afficionado of controversial history. I posted those articles because I wish to disemminate information to enlighten others and to elicit responses and discussion. At no time was I attempting to denigrate the Jews. If anything, the Dr. Henry Makow's articles that I posted indicated that the Jews were the unwitting pawns and victims of the Zionists. At no time did I vent any personal prejudice or venom against the Jews. Instead, I have posted what people like Joe Cortina and Dr. Henry Makow have written; however, I recognize these authors could have been partly or entirely wrong with regard to what they have published. Why did I post articles on the Zionists and related stuff? Simply because the Middle East and Israel have been in the spotlight ever since 9/11 and particularly so during the last couple of months. Furthermore, my sense of outrage was raised when I learned that the Zionists would not tolerate anyone to examine the Holocaust independently apart from the monumentous tomes of evidence and the awe-inspiring memorials they have assembled and erected. Even worse, Sharon and the Knesset enacted a law empowering Israel to charge and penalize, in absentia, anyone who dares utter a peep of doubt against the Holocaust. To me, all that is hubris non-pareil on the part of the Zionists and I had hoped readers would have singled that out for comment without my having to spill/spell it out here for them. But, to my utter surprise, no one did. Instead, an Impish Slimeball tried to have me stigmatized as a Jew-hater and a bigot by mis-attributing to me a segment of Joe Cortina's tirade against Bush. Then, it seems to me, a DementedMaligningAgitator or a holier-than-thou DedicatedMoralisingAdvocate" or simply a "DesiccatedMiserableA.h." perceived a bogeyman when and where, in fact, there was none. As I have pointed out before, I posted articles to disemminate information for general enlightenment, discussion and refutation. As an independent poster, I have not been beholden to any group whatsoever. When challenged over my posts, I have often felt obliged to respond as a matter of courtesy and to assert/maintain my credibility. Without a response, my posted articles would have died a natural death. And, of course, as you have reminded posters, those who wish to insulate themselves from my posts are ever at liberty to use the IGNORE option. Have a nice one! .