Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David Howe who wrote (16205)	9/29/2006 2:00:11 AM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

"Exactly. I've come to realize that we are arguing with trained monkeys or something similar to that." -lol- wow, well at least we are conscious. Better a trained monkey then being brain dead. -g- So, you are suggesting that the WTC supports were not designed to take any loads other then in a vertical dimension? i.e. the calculations were not considered, for example, of 150 mph hurricanes blowing sideways onto the building, or an aeroplane (fully loaded with fuel) crashing into the building (from the side, not falling on top of it) at near landing speed ???????????????????? Are you in a coma? Originally, I did think the planes crashing into the buildings at 525 mph + would have contributed to the collapses. Half em vee squared and all that. However the building took the initial impacts well, the fires were not consequential, and the collapses now unbelievable.