SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Actual left/right wing discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JBTFD who wrote (1826)9/26/2006 5:43:49 PM
From: Jim S  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 10087
 
"That is the down side to people getting away with what was an obvious retaliation in the Valerie Plame affair."

Huh? Who retaliated against whom in the Plame thing?



To: JBTFD who wrote (1826)9/27/2006 9:00:58 AM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 10087
 
What retaliation?

There have been no charges filed because there is no evidence to support that BDS type of accusation. Charges require evidence supported by facts....and the facts are that Plame is not even a covered person under the statute in question.

J.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News