Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Galapagos Islands -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mph who wrote (55698)	9/26/2006 8:21:18 PM
From: Oral Roberts	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 57110

I just caught a guy a couple of weeks ago stealing my stainless scrap metal. So we did the 911 thing and I made him unload his truck, etc. Cop couldn't get there by the time the guy leaves and dispatcher tells me not to stop him from leaving. So about a week ago the detective who is bringing the case forward calls me to interview me yet again. At the end he says was John driving the truck. I said well yeah, he was the only one there. He said are you sure. I said listen this is 6:30 am and I'm having coffee, yes I'm sure. 6:30 pm after martini's we could argue but not about this:) Anyhow I finish up and say gee, why are you questioning whether this guy was driving or not. Detective tells me he has a revoked license so they will also be charging him with driving after rev and he told them his friend was driving because of that. Friend actually says he was driving to bale this clown out. I assured him that John was alone and John was driving. After a pause he said I think you might get a kick out of this. I said ok, shoot. He said the guy that is giving John the alibi is also on parole and also has a revoked license so if he makes Johns alibi he is going to jail for driving after rev and as an accomplice for attempted burglary. Man these folks are morons.

To: mph who wrote (55698)	9/26/2006 11:38:51 PM
From: Alan Smithee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57110

That's right up there with the defendant charged with possession of pot. At the conclusion of a suppression hearing, the judge decides that there was no probable cause, and suppresses the evidence (pot). Lawyer tells his client this is good, we got the pot suppressed. At the end of the hearing, client goes up to the clerk and asks, "can I have my marijuana back now?"