Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Actual left/right wing discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (1843)	9/26/2006 6:34:46 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10087

So we find ourselves in one of those little uncomfy quandaries. If Mark clarifies what he is stating is obvious (the Plame outing was retaliation from the admin), you ask retaliation for what ... again obvious (Plame/Wilson anti-Bush admin activities)... you say prove it. Mark's position is that the available evidence failed to establish what he is convinced of (like many feel about the OJ case). Maybe he thinks there is more to it (cover-ups, scapegoating, conspiracy) also unprovable. Your position is that all this has now been debunked and there is no legitimate claim. There.