Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: elmatador who wrote (9715)	9/27/2006 1:55:01 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217835

ElM, I ran tallow ester trials quarter of a century ago in Wellington in a truck fleet. Among other things. Forget about it. Technologically, it works, economically, it doesn't. Note that they say biofuels requires government support. I don't see why one person, using petrol, should pay for a green maniac who wants to use an expensive fuel. The Greenies would argue that the cost of the greenhouse effect is not applied to the fossil hydrocarbon, so the biofuel should get a credit. I think the fossil hydrocarbon is preventing the world freezing up. We need more CO2, not less. Plants love it. Biofuel growers benefit from the free CO2 my petrol, electricity production, and jet fuel produce. I should get a tax credit for saving the world from its natural frozen state and providing food for the Greenies plants. It's all deja vu ElM. Saudi Arabia and others will cut their prices and that'll be the end of biofuel for another quarter century. Mqurice