SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (304687)9/27/2006 11:29:47 AM
From: combjelly  Respond to of 1572373
 
"Can we debate which party--based on their practice when in power--can better deal with the jihadist/terror threat? No, according to Clinton. That's illegitimate right-wing propaganda."

Talk about spin.

The question is legitimate. This administration has never allowed it to actually happen, to truly ask it is treason. If the debate is about how much the Democrats would give up to appease the terrorists, then it is legitimate.



To: Road Walker who wrote (304687)9/27/2006 12:43:03 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572373
 
JF, I liked the third reason, "Intimidating Critics." And Clinton accomplishes that by demonstrating low class, a short temper, and a loose grasp of the facts.

Yep, I see Rush cowering right now ...

Tenchusatsu



To: Road Walker who wrote (304687)9/28/2006 4:35:47 AM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1572373
 
Bill Clinton is a smart (and calculating) politician.

LOL. They hate it when they have been out-roved.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News