Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (6010)	9/27/2006 9:08:18 PM
From: sandintoes	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224737

I missed that, what did O'Reilly say to them?

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (6010)	9/27/2006 10:01:11 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224737

O'Reilly is a Bushie, and a hypocritical one too. He tells just enough truth to keep the facade going, that he's supposed unbiased and "no spin", but he's Rupert Murdoch's boy and he's constantly being biased and smearing democrats. I'm sure Carville and Begala held their own just fine. After all, they have the truth on their side. O'Reilly doesn't. Your opinion about O'Reilly is obviously distorted by the fact that you believe in rightwing myths and proven lies. Although I must say O'Reilly is not as bad as some. At least he admits he was wrong about Iraq and that Bush-CHeney and big oil are a crooked monopoly. When is Sean Hannity going to admit those obvious facts? Sean Hannity is truly an evil man. He deliberately lied to help; get us into Iraq, even telling his listeninger Iraqi oil would pay for everything. But he knew the truth, and has no respect at all for his listeners. Just propaganda artists both of them. Though O'Reilly is not anywhere near as bad as Hannity.