Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Innotelco Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Done, gone. who wrote (127)	9/28/2006 1:26:10 PM
From: creede	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 136

Mike, have you seen the 6 month chart on ILCO? Could it be that it's falling off like that due to dilution? I was also wondering why the A/S is 3B. SHARE STRUCTURE INFORMATION: As at Friday, March 30, 2006, according to the company. Common Stock issued and outstanding: Authorized shares: 3B Outstanding shares: 661,700,617M Restricted shares: 312,500,000M Float: 349,200,617M You have to admit that we both know of a stock in which the chart and the capital structure are far better. GB-ND c

To: Done, gone. who wrote (127)	9/28/2006 1:52:42 PM
From: rrufff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 136

Michal, I asked you a question calmly and you showed your anger. It's burning, burning,burning. . You have shown this type of response often even to the administrator of SI. You whine and cried and threatened to ignore him because you didn't get your way. Now, you have attacked me before I attacked you but I have to admit it may be a case of we both probably can't remember who attacked first. I'm willing to bury the hatchet or at least have a civil discussion. You've accused me of being a P&D'er. Would you kindly show how I pumped a stock at the same time that I was selling without disclosing, which is the typical definition of a P&Der. I suggest that you will be hard pressed to find posts where I advise anyone to buy. I post repeatedly that each person should do their own DD and make their own decisions. I also refuse to make precise predictions on share price even though I am often asked to do so. Please go find some cases where I do these things that typically are the mark of a P&D'er or a "stock promoter." I am open and honest about my trading and fairly objective. I do like to refute the claims of Moronic Generic Bashers and this apparently has caused your ire. So, I'll respond to your personal attack. Then maybe we can have a nice civil discussion. There is no real interest here so let's see if you have the stones to answer. Or will you just whine like the cowardly widdle weasel you are? You are upset because you were banned from boards so you start boards on stocks, you admittedly know nothing about and have nothing to add, just to get back at the moderator. Then you attack people who post on the other boards. You're upset that I didn't come over to your board??? It's like this board. There are very few posts that aren't OT. No real substance in your posts or on that board. Why waste time there or give it even the remotest of credibility? (I've posted, as you know, that I don't like the current system of banning here but I tend to post on boards that have some credible following, not just populated by those who glad hand each other's moronic generic bash. You seem to enjoy those boards. One of you posts something that is outdated or a personal attack against a poster you don't like and your budyas comes along and tell you it's a great post. You have to admit that is your style.) Most of the posts are about me or others, mere personal attacks. If you would post some substance, maybe you could get people to believe that the stock is a scam. But so far, the posts are mostly personal attacks, or outdated discussion or issues. You don't seem to even have a grasp of how the pink sheet market works. Do you ever have an original thought? Posting Moronic Generic Bash that can be applied to any pink sheeter does not a substantive post make. Oh well, in case you forgot, maybe this will calm you down. You really did look foolish. ******************************************************* To: SI Admin (Dave) who wrote (24425) 9/17/2006 6:18:56 PM From: Michal Daniel My post was neither bullish nor bearish. It answered a question and pointed out the facts. I expected to be banned because the board is not moderated as it should be. As I told you in the PM I just sent you, this is the last you'll hear from me. After ten years of doing so, I'm done helping your organization. I no longer believe there is any hope for it. Please don't bother replying, I just put you on ignore. Message 22821146 *********************************************************** By the way, you could always BAN me here, as you did before, in your most hypocritical fashion.

To: Done, gone. who wrote (127)	9/28/2006 2:15:11 PM
From: rrufff	Respond to of 136

By the way, Michal, I forgot ask if you have any support for this statement or did you just pull it out of your posterior as you typically do when you get angry and frustrated? so-called "moderator" best buddy of yours: I don't think I have to justify to you or anyone else who is a buddy or not, but where is your evidence that anyone here on SI is my best buddy, either in the internet sense or otherwise? I post on many boards, some of which are moderated by someone who moderates a lot of boards. Does that make me a "best buddy" or a "promoter?" I'm posting here on your board. Does that make us "best buddies?" You may say that you and I disagree so we can't be "best buddies." Well, do an advanced search and you will see at least a couple of disagreements between me and the gentleman to whom you refer as my "best buddy." I say what I feel and that's why people respect my posts. I don't care to whom I say it. It's about substantive discussion, not just glad handing and posterior kissing, which seems to be more your style.