Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ichy Smith who wrote (204604)	9/29/2006 9:07:37 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Some land after 1 year more after 5, over a 20 year program. But attacks on Israel should be paid for by land being given to Israel. My belief is similar.. So long as Palestinians are attacking Israel, there will be no discussion on land already taken by Israel for settlements adjacent to the previous 1967 "green line". I still believe the 2000 land offer is a great place to start and as soon as the Israeli's have finished their wall, then they should unilaterally pull out of the West Bank. Once a peace settlement is secured and holds, then they can negotiate any future border adjustments. mideastweb.org If the Palestinians continue to wage wage upon Israel after such a withdrawal, then all bets are off and Israel should continue its policy of retaliation against the leadership of the perpetrators. Hawk