SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Speculating in Takeover Targets -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: richardred who wrote (1261)10/5/2006 1:11:35 PM
From: Skywatcher  Respond to of 7257
 
Scrappy Ryanair Targets Aer Lingus
Parmy Olson, 10.05.06, 11:30 AM ET
Ryanair Holdings shocked the aviation industry on Thursday by launching a 1.48 billion euro ($1.88 billion) takeover bid for Ireland's flagship airline, Aer Lingus, after taking a 16% stake in the company.

Shares in Aer Lingus shot up 14.7%, to 2.89 euros ($3.67), in early afternoon trading on the London Stock Exchange, while Ryanair (nasdaq: RYAAY - news - people ) was up 3.33%, at 9 euros ($11.42) per share. Aer Lingus said it was considering Ryanair's announcement and urged its other shareholders not to respond to the offer before it made a statement.

Ryanair's previous record for a takeover was its relatively piddling 5 million euro ($6.3 million) absorption of Buzz, previously a unit of KLM Royal Dutch Airlines (nyse: AKH - news - people ). The company is now offering 2.80 euros ($3.55) per share in cash for the remaining shares in Aer Lingus, which listed on the London and Dublin stock markets at the beginning of this week at 2.20 euros ($2.79) per share.

Michael O'Leary, Ryanair's fiery and outspoken chief executive, said in a statement that the offer represented "a unique opportunity to form one strong airline group for Ireland and for European consumers."

"'If accepted, the Irish Government will realize over 500 million euros ($634 million) from the sale of their Aer Lingus shares and the employees will realize over 220 million euros ($280 million), which equates to an average of over 60,000 euros ($76,140) per employee," he said. Ryanair pledged that Aer Lingus' average short-haul fare of 87.55 euros ($111) in 2005 would fall by 2.5% each year for a minimum of four years.

It may sound a tempting offer for Aer Lingus' shareholders and workforce, but some observers are scratching their heads as to Ryanair's intentions. "I think it's opportunistic," said Nick van den Brul, an aviation analyst with BNP Paribas. "It calls into question where Ryanair is going to go with it, and represents a change in their business model."

A big change. While Ryanair is Europe's biggest low-cost airline, specializing in short-haul flights between second-tier airports, Aer Lingus is a far more traditional carrier which offers long-haul flights, including routes from Dublin to the United States.

Ryanair insists that a takeover wouldn't spell an integration of Aer Lingus into Ryan Air, since Aer Lingus would keep its own brand and continue to execute its current business model.

But van den Brul calculates that a takeover of Aer Lingus would mean a margin dilution at Ryanair from 21% to 18%, not great news for investors who bought shares in Ryanair because of its combination of growth and high profits. "The key question is: What is the growth for the low-cost European model, relative to higher-cost long-haul model?"

Another key question is, why takeover Aer Lingus at all? Doug McVitie, an analyst at aerospace consultancy Arran Aerospace, believes O'Leary’s bid is "purely and simply a political move to gain leverage with the Irish government."

"O'Leary's not interested in finesse or Aer Lingus' business-class economics, he just wants to have more say in the future of aviation in Ireland, which starts at Dublin Airport," McVitie said.

Earlier this week O'Leary had been so irked at the predicted cost of the new Terminal 2 at Dublin Airport, that he has offered for Ryanair build it instead for 250 million euros ($317 million), far less than the 600 million euro ($760 million) budget that the Irish government had forecast.

Ryanair might want a greater say in how the Dublin Airport expands, including making sure that the new Terminal 2 is filled with ramps for Ryanair aircraft instead of Aer Lingus planes, as is currently expected. "If Ryanair was the dominant carrier at Dublin through the acquisition of Aer Lingus, it could rearrange take-off and landing schedules much more to its own convenience," said McVitie.

"O'Leary firmly believes the Irish government doesn't know what it's doing at Dublin Airport, or in aviation in general, and he's prepared to go to some lengths to show it," added McVitie. "They're politicians, after all, not aerospace specialists, so he has a point. It's just his manner of getting that point across which is a little 'unconventional.'"

A spokesman for Ryanair said that Aer Lingus also did not approve of the "overly high" landing fees charged at Dublin Airport, and the two airlines therefore had a similar agenda. But he did not wish to comment when asked if, following a takeover of Aer Lingus, Ryanair would lobby for more slots at Dublin Airport.

It's possible that a takeover of Aer Lingus is so illogically divergent from Ryanair's traditional business model that the bid is more of a warning shot at the Irish government than a serious offer. "Only Michael O'Leary could come out with a stunt like this," said McVitie.

That said, the fact that Aer Lingus shares are trading above the Ryanair bid indicates that investors think further offers may be coming.



To: richardred who wrote (1261)11/13/2006 10:18:29 AM
From: richardred  Respond to of 7257
 
FoxHollow Taken to the Cleaners
Friday November 10, 1:22 pm ET
By Billy Fisher

On Thursday, FoxHollow Technologies (Nasdaq: FOXH - News) suffered a bad beat upon the release of its quarterly earnings. The Redwood City-based medical device maker reported revenue of $53.8 million, a 49% increase over the $36.1 million it produced in the year-ago period. The company also reported third-quarter net income of $6.7 million, or $0.26 per diluted share, versus a net loss of $1.5 million, or $0.06 per share, for the year-ago quarter.

Nevertheless, the market showed the stock no mercy as the company lowered its full-year earnings guidance. The stock closed Thursday at $28.90 on nearly 10 times its normal trading volume, a 20% decrease from Wednesday's closing price of $35.91.

While the punishment was quite severe for a company just breaking into the black, the company's future guidance falls well short of Wall Street's expectations. According to a Thomson Financial poll, analysts were expecting a FY 2006 loss of $0.17 per share. The company, however, issued new guidance indicating a loss between $0.35 and $0.39 per share, a hefty drop from its previously predicted loss between $0.07 and $0.22 per share. The revised outlook promptly led Piper Jaffray and First Albany Capital to downgrade their previous ratings on the stock.

The updated loss-per-share estimates include approximately $23.6 million in stock-based compensation and a one-time charge of $3.5 million related to the assignment of a facility lease.

While the turn to profitability is promising, I do understand Wall Street's caution with respect to the company's stock price. The company has cutting-edge technology, designing and selling medical devices for the treatment of peripheral artery disease. However, FoxHollow itself notes in its 10-Q that the company's business relies primarily on a single product, the SilverHawk. The SilverHawk is a minimally invasive single-use catheter system designed to remove plaque from arteries.

The company also notes in the "Risk Factors" section of its 10-Q that "Growth in the demand for SilverHawk has slowed, and our failure to generate additional demand may negatively impact our operating revenue." Among other risks, it also mentions the limited long-term safety data on the SilverHawk.

While these caveats are presented more to allow the company's 10-Q to conform to SEC guidelines than to suggest that the future growth of SilverHawk is doomed, they do point out slowing demand and the company's huge reliance on a single product. The profits FoxHollow is now turning in are certainly commendable, and it's positioned in a very lucrative industry, should its demand kick up. For the time being, though, I'm inclined to wait and see rather than charging in to buy.
biz.yahoo.com