Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : FREE AMERICA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JDN who wrote (12056)	10/1/2006 4:26:40 PM
From: Proud_Infidel	Respond to of 14758

US slams Annan deputy for criticizing US, British stand on Darfur AFP ^ \| 10/01/06 \| AFP news.yahoo.com UNITED NATIONS (AFP) - US Ambassador John Bolton took UN deputy secretary general Mark Malloch Brown to task after the latter criticized Washington and London for their "megaphone diplomacy" in trying to persuade Sudan to accept a UN force in Darfur. In an interview with the Independent newspaper, Malloch Brown, Kofi Annan's deputy, said the US and British approach was "counterproductive almost" and opened the door to Sudan comparing itself to Iraq and Afghanistan, both invaded as part of the "war on terror". "These remarks bring discredit to the UN and are a stain on its reputation," said Bolton, the US envoy to the UN. "Mr Malloch Brown should apologize to (US President George W.) Bush and (British Prime Minister Tony) Blair." "We are proud we have called the attention of the international community to the tragedy in Darfur ... And to have Malloch Brown attack those efforts brings great discredit to this effort," he added. In June, Bolton clashed with Malloch Brown after Annan's deputy suggested that Washington was not informing the American people about the UN's good work in support of US foreign policy goals. In response, Bolton, on a trip to London, then said: "It is illegitimate for an international civil servant to criticize what he thinks are the inadequacies of the citizens of a member government." Last month, the UN Security Council agreed to send 17,000 troops and 3,000 police to Darfur to take over from an ill-equipped and cash-strapped African Union force. But Khartoum is adamantly opposed to the deployment of a robust UN contingent in Darfur. "Sudan doesn't see a united international community," Malloch Brown told the Independent. "And that allows it to characterize themselves as the victims of the next crusade after Iraq and Afghanistan... So Tony Blair and George Bush need to get beyond this posturing and grandstanding," he noted. "This megaphone diplomacy coming out of Washington and London -- 'you damn well are going to let the UN deploy and if you don't, beware the circumstances' -- isn't plausible," he added. Because of Khartoum's refusal to accept the UN force, African Union leaders have agreed to extend the mandate of their operation until December 31 after receiving promises of UN logistical support and funding from Arab states.

To: JDN who wrote (12056)	10/4/2006 8:29:40 AM
From: Proud_Infidel	Respond to of 14758

Annan's financial form to be secret The Washington Times ^ \| 4 OCTOBER 2006 \| Betsy Pisik washingtontimes.com NEW YORK -- U.N. officials said yesterday that they will not publicly release a financial disclosure form filed by Secretary-General Kofi Annan last month -- 10 months after he ordered all senior U.N. officials to file the forms. A spokesman said Mr. Annan submitted the questionnaire -- under a policy implemented in response to international outrage over U.N. involvement in the Iraq oil-for-food scandal -- on Sept. 22. "The secretary-general has filed the forms," Stephane Dujarric confirmed yesterday. But, he said, "We will not be making it public." John R. Bolton, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, did not return a call asking about that decision, but other critics of the world body argued that the disclosure form should be made public. "Kofi Annan has not gone far enough. He should make the financial disclosure publicly available for outside scrutiny," said Nile Gardiner, director of the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom at the Heritage Foundation. "The culture of secrecy remains intact in the upper echelon of the United Nations." Mr. Annan implemented the disclosure-form policy as one of several moves to reform the institution in the wake of the oil-for-food scandal. Massive fraud was uncovered in a $64 billion program run by the United Nations that allowed Saddam Hussein's Iraq to sell a limited amount of oil. (Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ....