SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: David Howe who wrote (16405)9/30/2006 1:17:31 PM
From: Orcastraiter  Respond to of 20039
 
Why would a picture of the early stages of rebuilding the Pentagon show aircraft parts?

Why would a picture of the early stages of rebuilding show a fire truck with it's ladder extended and fire hose on the ground?

If a jet hit the building, wouldn't there be some marks on the building where the wings hit? And the huge tail, what happened to that?

I think this photo was taken the day after, 9-12, near mid day. Notice the shadows are small. The fires are out, but the first responders are still there. A mobile crane was just moved in. The track crane was probably already on site since the Pentagon was under construction.

Important questions above. You will probably not be able to answer them any more than you can answer why the 19 hijackers all bought their tickets with cash, yet none of them were on the passenger lists.



To: David Howe who wrote (16405)9/30/2006 10:01:38 PM
From: Proud Deplorable  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20039
 
Very funny. I have eyes you know. No plane was removed from under that rubble because it wasn't a large plane, it was either a small plane delivering explosives or one of the missiles from the anti-aricraft installations ringing the Pentagon designed to shoot down jetliners flying overhead to lane at Reagan.




To: David Howe who wrote (16405)10/1/2006 12:05:55 AM
From: Proud Deplorable  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20039