Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (204854)	10/1/2006 12:23:10 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Well, the point is that "violent sectarian disorder," in and of itself, doesn't accomplish anything but chaos. War makes a kind of sense, regardless of whether it's a big war or a little war. Killing people at random is more theater than politics.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (204854)	10/1/2006 1:10:48 AM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Nadine, one has to parse every one of your posts with your extreme pro-Israel bias in mind. For you, it's better that America suffers an infinitely long hell in Iraq than some anti-Israel Islamic government take over.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (204854)	10/1/2006 3:26:28 AM
From: geode00	Respond to of 281500

creating violent sectarian disorder Well, since the professionals were telling Bush/Cheney/Rummy that they weren't sending in enough people and didn't have any kind of a plan, then you must agree that they were also interested in said disorder. Since Republicans are the number one power in Iraq and Iraq is in said state of disorder, what do you think is their reason for creating violent sectarian disorder? What are their ends on the heads of all of these dead Iraqis and Americans? Or shall we simply agree that Republicans are simply incompetent.