SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RMF who wrote (7470)10/1/2006 7:57:00 PM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36917
 
No. I think that we should not take one piece of bad "scientific evidence" and destroy the global economy without examining the issue more thoroughly. If you care to do some reading you will find that 100% of the global warming "proof" relies on the rings of a single tree. It has been debunked, but the people who hold the purse strings of public funding subscribe to the GW religion, thus mercilessly enforce its upholding in funding "research".



To: RMF who wrote (7470)10/2/2006 4:20:43 PM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36917
 
I think that once evidence is refuted, it should be central to the debate whenever it is used as evidence. Almost all GW cult science rests on Mann's refuted work. That doesn't seem to bother any of the GW cult members.

If you wish to have an intelligent debate please read this:

Message 22841976


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News