SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (145245)10/1/2006 9:55:57 PM
From: hedgefund  Respond to of 152472
 
Don't take a taxicab to the post office next week cause you won't find any toaster there...(but I gotta like your enthusiasm)



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (145245)11/15/2006 4:27:32 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Mq, it seems that you are on the money in the Toaster Open/Invitational. I support your contention that you should be declared the winner forthwith, with QCOM on $38 now, with only a few weeks to Xmas:

<I am reviewing the Toaster Open and I think I should be declared overall Winner. Admittedly we haven't quite reached the finishing line, but I want to get in first before too many people unignore Limtex and ruin my end of year price for QCOM of $38.42

Note only one post from Thehammer Message 22053195 - a wild guess at that, spoiling my carefully calculated 4 significant figures $38.42 with a random and meaningless end of year $38. His WAG should be ignored. $28 for a low! Absurd!!! A triple !!! absurd. He just wanted to take out the low by a slimy low-ball.
>

Mqurice

PS: I am studiously ignoring Elroy's year end bid as he didn't include a high/low and anyone could just put in the lowest bid just to be at the low end. The reasoning for the end of year price should also be adjudicated. My end-of-year price boe sophisticated calculation was not just a low-ball lucky guess. Check out the why and wherefore: Message 22087843