Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 100cfm who wrote (145271)	10/2/2006 9:15:06 AM
From: Jim Mullens	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

100cfm, Re:BRCM v QCOM and "I think Q would rather lose the ITC case than make a concillatory settlement. " Previously asked / unanswered>>> ++ Also, if BRCM should win with their "minor" 3G IPR, what does this imply for the Q in their GSM infringement action which essentially enabled GSM to extend its life by 10 years and compete against CDMA2000? +++ In other words, could this potential loss set up a HUGE win for the Q against NOK (BRCM /others) for GSM infringement?